Radiation risks and uncertainties: a scoping review to support communication and informed decision-making.

作者: Tanja Perko , Peter Thijssen , Ortwin Renn , Ferdiana Hoti

DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/AB885F

关键词:

摘要: Although radiation protection is challenged by many uncertainties, there no systematic study investigating the definitions and types of these uncertainties. To address this gap, in paper we offer a scoping review to comprehensively analyse, for first time, peer-reviewed scientific articles (n = 33) related uncertainties following exposure situations: nuclear emergencies, decommissioning nuclear/radiological installations long-term radiological situations (e.g. naturally occurring radioactive materials). The results suggest that firstly, agreement regarding uncertainty, which mainly defined based on its sources, or categories rather than meaning. Secondly, different actors are faced with Uncertainties community mostly data methodology-driven dose-response relationships), those decision-makers likely consequences decision options public reactions, while laypeople's trustworthiness experts emotional potential specific risk exposures. Furthermore, majority focus community, information receivers (i.e. laypeople) receive much less consideration. Finally, was difference across risk-related areas analysed (radiation versus other risks). Based findings, provide some preliminary recommendations research uncertainty protection, as well communication practices.

参考文章(62)
Marjolein B. A. van Asselt, Jan Rotmans, Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling Climatic Change. ,vol. 54, pp. 75- 105 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1015783803445
Anthony G. Patt, Elke U. Weber, Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 5, pp. 219- 232 ,(2014) , 10.1002/WCC.259
Rebecca E. Morss, Julie L. Demuth, Ann Bostrom, Jeffrey K. Lazo, Heather Lazrus, Flash Flood Risks and Warning Decisions: A Mental Models Study of Forecasters, Public Officials, and Media Broadcasters in Boulder, Colorado. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 35, pp. 2009- 2028 ,(2015) , 10.1111/RISA.12403
Vicki M. Bier, Shi-Woei Lin, On the treatment of uncertainty and variability in making decisions about risk. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 33, pp. 1899- 1907 ,(2013) , 10.1111/RISA.12071
Laura Maxim, Jeroen P. van der Sluijs, Quality in environmental science for policy: Assessing uncertainty as a component of policy analysis Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 14, pp. 482- 492 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2011.01.003
Laura Maxim, Pascale Mansier, Natalia Grabar, Public reception of scientific uncertainty in the endocrine disrupter controversy: the case of male fertility Journal of Risk Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 677- 695 ,(2013) , 10.1080/13669877.2012.726245
John D Boice, None, Uncertainties in studies of low statistical power. Journal of Radiological Protection. ,vol. 30, pp. 115- 120 ,(2010) , 10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/E02
Rikard Levin, Sven Ove Hansson, Christina Rudén, Indicators of uncertainty in chemical risk assessments. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. ,vol. 39, pp. 33- 43 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.YRTPH.2003.11.001