What Mean Impacts Miss

作者: Jonah B. Gelbach , Hilary W. Hoynes , Marianne P. Bitler

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Labor supply theory predicts systematic heterogeneity in the impact of recent welfare reforms on earnings, transfers, and income. Yet most reform research focuses mean impacts. We investigate importance using random-assignment data from Connecticut’s Jobs First waiver, which features key elements post-1996 programs. Estimated quantile treatment eects exhibit substantial predicted by labor theory. Thus impacts miss a great deal. Looking separately at samples dropouts other women does not improve performance conclude that reform’s are likely both more varied extensive than has been recognized.

参考文章(4)
Rajeev Dehejia, When is ATE enough? Risk aversion and inequality aversion in evaluating training programs Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ,vol. 21, pp. 263- 287 ,(2008) , 10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00009-6
PAUL R. ROSENBAUM, DONALD B. RUBIN, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika. ,vol. 70, pp. 41- 55 ,(1983) , 10.1093/BIOMET/70.1.41
Keisuke Hirano, Guido W. Imbens, Geert Ridder, Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score Econometrica. ,vol. 71, pp. 1161- 1189 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1468-0262.00442