The role of added feed enzymes in promoting gut health in swine and poultry.

作者: Elijah Kiarie , Luis F. Romero , Charles M. Nyachoti

DOI: 10.1017/S0954422413000048

关键词:

摘要: The value of added feed enzymes (FE) in promoting growth and efficiency nutrient utilisation is well recognised single-stomached animal production. However, the effects FE on microbiome gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are largely unrecognised. A critical role host nutrition, health, performance quality products produced played by intestinal microbiota. can make an impact GIT microbial ecology reducing undigested substrates anti-nutritive factors producing oligosaccharides situ from dietary NSP with potential prebiotic effects. Investigations molecular microbiology techniques have demonstrated FE-mediated responses energy broiler chickens that were associated certain clusters bacteria. Furthermore, investigations using specific enteric pathogen challenge models efficacy modulating gut health. Because probably change substrate characteristics along GIT, subsequent microbiota will vary according to populations present at time administration their reaction such changes. Therefore, administration, rather than being absolute, a continuum or population responses. recognition thus health stimulate development capable benefit under production conditions. review brings light opportunities challenges for major (carbohydrases phytase) poultry swine species focus

参考文章(126)
M. R. Bedford, G. G. Partridge, Feed enzymes, the future: bright hope or regulatory minefield? Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. pp. 304- 311 ,(2010) , 10.1079/9781845936747.0304
F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck, E. Teirlynck, F. van Immerseel, V. Eeckhaut, R. Ducatelle, Mechanisms of action of nutritional tools to control intestinal zoonotic pathogens World Poultry Science Association, Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Strasbourg, France, 26-30 August, 2007. pp. 243- 250 ,(2007)
T. Rinttilä, J. Apajalahti, A. Kettunen, Does the composition of intestinal microbiota determine or reflect feed conversion efficiency Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 19-22 February 2012. pp. 32- 39 ,(2012)
O. Simon, The mode of action of NSP hydrolysing enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. ,vol. 7, pp. 115- 123 ,(1998) , 10.22358/JAFS/69959/1998
M. S. Geier, D. Stanley, R. J. Moore, R. J. Hughes, The role of gastrointestinal tract microbiota in chicken productivity. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 19-22 February 2012. pp. 262- 265 ,(2012)
B. Jensen, The impact of feed additives on the microbial ecology of the gut in young pigs Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. ,vol. 7, pp. 45- 64 ,(1998) , 10.22358/JAFS/69955/1998
Maria Francesch, Enric Esteve-Garcia, Joaquim Brufau, Merce Almirall, Anna M. Perez-Vendrell, The Differences in Intestinal Viscosity Produced by Barley and β-Glucanase Alter Digesta Enzyme Activities and Ileal Nutrient Digestibilities More in Broiler Chicks than in Cocks Journal of Nutrition. ,vol. 125, pp. 947- 955 ,(1995) , 10.1093/JN/125.4.947
R.I. Mackie, J.M. Simpson, V.J. McCracken, M.W.A. Verstegen, R.I. Aminovi, H.R. Gaskins, D.B. Anderson, Gut Microbiology and growth-promoting antibiotics in swine Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B, Livestock Feeds and Feeding. ,vol. 20, pp. 115- 122 ,(1999)
David F Ollis, James Edwin Bailey, Biochemical engineering fundamentals Published in <b>1986</b> in New York by McGraw-Hill. ,(1986)
John R. Pluske, Bruce P. Mullan, David J. Hampson, David W. Pethick, Zorica Durmic, Peter M. Siba, The incidence of swine dysentery in pigs can be reduced by feeding diets that limit the amount of fermentable substrate entering the large intestine Journal of Nutrition. ,vol. 126, pp. 2920- 2933 ,(1996) , 10.1093/JN/126.11.2920