Between Individualism and Collectivism? Why Employers Choose Non-Union Collective Agreements

作者: Chris Briggs , Rae Cooper

DOI: 10.1080/10301763.2006.10669342

关键词:

摘要: ABSTRACT Why do employers choose to make, or not non-union collective agreements? Based on a study of s170LK (LK) agreements in the federal jurisdiction, our key finding is that employer choices relation these are rarely product ideological frames such as collectivism individualism, overarching human resource strategies. Whilst LK were sometimes chosen because their fit with ‘soft’ strategies, agreement more commonly driven by practical, utilitarian assessments administrative cost, efficiency and practical efficacy instruments for achieving particular workplace changes (usually reconfiguring award wage—hours nexus). The offered successfully implemented well-organised worksites, but they have nonetheless been used circumstances exclude, marginalise substitute unions. As recent WorkChoices amendments open up new opportunities lowering labou...

参考文章(5)
Laura Bennett, Women and Enterprise Bargaining: The Legal and Institutional Framework: Journal of Industrial Relations. ,vol. 36, pp. 191- 212 ,(1994) , 10.1177/002218569403600201
Richard Mitchell, Joel Fetter, Human Resource Management and Individualisation in Australian Labour Law Journal of Industrial Relations. ,vol. 45, pp. 292- 325 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1472-9296.00085
S Deery, Australia at Work: Just Managing? LABOUR AND INDUSTRY. ,vol. 11, pp. 145- 146 ,(2000)
Russell D. Lansbury, Bradon Ellem, Marian Baird, Rae Cooper, Workchoices, myth-making at work: [Paper in: Whose Choices? Analysis of the Current Industrial Relations 'Reforms'.] Journal of Australian Political Economy. pp. 13- ,(2005)
Ray Markey, Paul Gollan, Iain Ross, Additional forms of employee representation in Australia Research Papers in Economics. ,(2001)