Orthopedic In-Training Examination: An Analysis of the Sports Medicine Section-An Update.

作者: John Synovec , Leah Plumblee , William Barfield , Harris Slone

DOI: 10.1016/J.JSURG.2018.06.019

关键词:

摘要: OBJECTIVE Previously published studies have evaluated Orthopedic In-Training Examination sports medicine questions, but none whether question difficulty has changed over time. DESIGN Sports subsection questions between 2012 and 2016 were compared with previously data on from 2004 to 2009. Question categories classified into 1 of 3 taxonomy levels—basic recall, diagnosis, advanced problem solving. SETTING Medical University South Carolina; Charleston, SC, 29425; Institution. PARTICIPANTS Two residents the Subsection separately. Then an attending physician resolve discrepancies. A statistician was used for analysis. RESULTS Utilization imaging modalities averaged 37%, 28% (11/39) containing 2 or more modalities. There increases in utilization problem-solving (45% vs. 27%, p = 0.002) decreases basic recall (49% 67%, p = 0.008) data. CONCLUSIONS While percentage represented by remained relatively unchanged, there fewer requiring demonstrate simple increased demand perform solving while utilizing multiple

参考文章(26)
Brent Ponce, Jay Savage, Amit Momaya, Jacob Seales, James Oliver, Gerald McGwin, Steven Theiss, Association between orthopaedic in-training examination subsection scores and ABOS Part I examination performance Southern Medical Journal. ,vol. 107, pp. 746- 750 ,(2014) , 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000208
Joseph D Zuckerman, Michael Walsh, Gregg R Klein, Ryan G Miyamoto, Orthopedic surgery residents' study habits and performance on the orthopedic in-training examination. American journal of orthopedics. ,vol. 36, ,(2007)
David M. Dines, Daryl C. Osbahr, Asheesh Bedi, Joshua S. Dines, Michael B. Cross, Samuel A. Taylor, An analysis of the shoulder and elbow section of the orthopedic in-training examination. American journal of orthopedics. ,vol. 41, pp. 63- 68 ,(2012)
Bryan D. Haughom, Zach Goldstein, Michael D. Hellman, Paul H. Yi, Rachel M. Frank, Brett R. Levine, An Analysis of References Used for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: What are Their Levels of Evidence and Journal Impact Factors? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. ,vol. 472, pp. 4024- 4032 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11999-014-3895-0
Henry J. Mankin, The Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 75, pp. 108- 116 ,(1971) , 10.1097/00003086-197103000-00014
Michael B. Cross, Daryl C. Osbahr, Denis Nam, Keith R. Reinhardt, Mathias P.G. Bostrom, Joshua S. Dines, An Analysis of the Hip and Knee Reconstruction Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Orthopedics. ,vol. 34, ,(2011) , 10.3928/01477447-20110714-10
J A Buckwalter, R Schumacher, J P Albright, R R Cooper, Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 56, pp. 115- 121 ,(1981) , 10.1097/00001888-198102000-00006
David R Marker, Dawn M LaPorte, Thorsten M Seyler, Slif D Ulrich, Mike S McGrath, Frank J Frassica, Michael A Mont, Orthopaedic journal publications and their role in the preparation for the orthopaedic in-training examination. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 91, pp. 59- 66 ,(2009) , 10.2106/JBJS.I.00559
Uma Srikumaran, Michael T Freehill, Andrea M Spiker, Edward G McFarland, Steve A Petersen, Evaluation of shoulder and elbow questions on the orthopaedic in-training examination as an instrument for enhancing examination preparation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 93, ,(2011) , 10.2106/JBJS.J.01531