A comparison of approaches for combining predictive markers for personalised treatment recommendations.

作者: Matthias Pierce , Richard Emsley

DOI: 10.1186/S13063-020-04901-2

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND In the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects, it is desirable to divide patients into subgroups based on their expected response treatment. This formalised via a personalised recommendation: an algorithm that uses biomarker measurements select treatments. It could be multiple, rather than single, biomarkers better predict these subgroups. However, finding optimal combination multiple can difficult prediction problem. METHODS We described three parametric methods for in recommendation, using randomised trial data: regression approach models outcome by interactions; proposed Kraemer forms combined measure from individual weights, calculated all treated and control pairs; novel modification Kraemer's utilises prognostic score sample matched subjects. Using Monte Carlo simulations under data-generating models, we compare approaches draw conclusions improvement recommendation compared standard The are applied data home-delivered pragmatic rehabilitation versus as usual with chronic fatigue syndrome (the FINE trial). Prior analysis this indicated some effect heterogeneity correlated biomarkers. RESULTS outperformed across scenarios. leads improved recommendations, except case where there was strong unobserved biomarker. example, method weak its algorithm. CONCLUSIONS does not perform combining All sensitive misspecification models.

参考文章(14)
Adam Kapelner, Zachary D. Cohen, Justin Bleich, Richard Berk, Robert J. DeRubeis, Inference for Treatment Regime Models in Personalized Medicine arXiv: Methodology. ,(2014)
Baqun Zhang, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Marie Davidian, Min Zhang, Eric Laber, Estimating optimal treatment regimes from a classification perspective Stat. ,vol. 1, pp. 103- 114 ,(2012) , 10.1002/STA.411
David P. Byar, Assessing apparent treatment—covariate interactions in randomized clinical trials Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 4, pp. 255- 263 ,(1985) , 10.1002/SIM.4780040304
Yingqi Zhao, Donglin Zeng, A. John Rush, Michael R. Kosorok, Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 107, pp. 1106- 1118 ,(2012) , 10.1080/01621459.2012.695674
Holly Janes, Marshall D. Brown, Ying Huang, Margaret S. Pepe, An Approach to Evaluating and Comparing Biomarkers for Patient Treatment Selection The International Journal of Biostatistics. ,vol. 10, pp. 99- 121 ,(2014) , 10.1515/IJB-2012-0052
B. B. Hansen, The prognostic analogue of the propensity score Biometrika. ,vol. 95, pp. 481- 488 ,(2008) , 10.1093/BIOMET/ASN004
Xiao Song, Margaret Sullivan Pepe, Evaluating Markers for Selecting a Patient's Treatment Biometrics. ,vol. 60, pp. 874- 883 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0006-341X.2004.00242.X
A. J. Wearden, G. Dunn, C. Dowrick, R. K. Morriss, Depressive symptoms and pragmatic rehabilitation for chronic fatigue syndrome British Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 201, pp. 227- 232 ,(2012) , 10.1192/BJP.BP.111.107474