摘要: Abstract This article argues that technology should be considered to among the structures of environmental injustice. Explaining can inherently just or unjust—that is, material artifacts comprise technological infrastructures more less compatible with environmentally social arrangements—it suggests most existing is relatively incompatible justice. It then offers a list design features would help make fair distribution risks and benefits, equitable enforcement protective regulations, ability marginalized communities build economic capacity, meaningful public participation in decision making. Recognizing role plays structuring injustice justice practitioners recognize advocate for world.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(9)
David Schlosberg, Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature Oxford University Press. ,(2007)
Langdon Winner, Do Artifacts Have Politics Routledge. pp. 177- 192 ,(2017) , 10.4324/9781315259697-21
David Schlosberg, Environmental justice and the new pluralism : the challenge of difference for environmentalism Oxford University Press. ,(1999)
Sheila R. Foster, Luke W. Cole, From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement ,(2000)
Dean Nieusma, Alternative Design Scholarship: Working Toward Appropriate Design Design Issues. ,vol. 20, pp. 13- 24 ,(2004) , 10.1162/0747936041423280
Kristin Sharon Shrader-Frechette, Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy ,(2002)
Gwen Ottinger, Epistemic Fencelines: Air Monitoring Instruments and Expert-Resident Boundaries Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for The History and Philosophy of Science. ,vol. 3, pp. 55- 67 ,(2010) , 10.4245/SPONGE.V3I1.6115
Eileen Gauna, The Environmental Justice Misfit: Public Participation and the Paradigm Paradox Stanford Environmental Law Journal. ,vol. 17, pp. 3- ,(1998)