Intraoral wound closure with tissue-engineered mucosa: new perspectives for urethra reconstruction with buccal mucosa grafts.

作者: Günter Lauer , Ronald Schimming , Alexander Frankenschmidt

DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00005

关键词:

摘要: In urethra reconstruction, the creation of a new from free oral mucosa graft is an established surgical technique. The removed at same time that reconstruction procedure performed. Depending on size required, intraoral wound closed primarily or left to heal secondarily. latter method limits this technique by leading scars strictures, which have negative impact condition soft tissue. Therefore, in study, pilot study involving 12 patients, tissue-engineered was tested for covering defects avoid drawbacks mentioned above. For tissue-graft engineering, biopsy sample 2 4 mm diameter hard palate approximately weeks before be addition, 30 ml autogenous serum extracted venous whole-blood sample. primary cultures were incubated Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium and nutrient factor F (Gibco Co., Eggenstein, Germany), containing usual additives serum. After period 3 weeks, subcultivation performed engineer transplants consisting several layers keratinocytes support foil. thorough intraoperative blood coagulation had occurred, cultured carrier foil applied surface fixed single sutures. Additionally, covered 8 10 days dressing, also onto suture loops. It possible perform closure with cover defect sizes as large 11.0 x 4.0 cm. This provides better prospect both tissue defects. number strictures are diminished. special interest functional unit cavity, including cosmetic conditions (e.g., case prosthetic rehabilitation). comparison local tissue, presented reduces severity postoperative pain allows faster rehabilitation patients because wound-healing process. Furthermore, mobility structures achieved.

参考文章(37)
Michael E. Mitchell, Mark C. Adams, Richard C. Rink, Urethral replacement with ureter. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 139, pp. 1282- 1285 ,(1987) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42893-X
S. Regauer, C. C. Compton, G. G. Gallico, N. E. O'Connor, D. A. Bradford, J. M. Gill, Skin regenerated from cultured epithelial autografts on full-thickness burn wounds from 6 days to 5 years after grafting. A light, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study. Laboratory Investigation. ,vol. 60, pp. 600- 612 ,(1989)
Gerard M Shannon, Joseph C Flanagan, Charles B Campbell, Conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy With Mucous Membrane Graft Ophthalmic surgery. ,vol. 14, pp. 647- 652 ,(1983) , 10.3928/1542-8877-19830801-03
P.G. Ransley, P.G. Duffy, Irene L. Oesch, P. Van Oyen, D. Hoover, The use of bladder mucosa and combined bladder mucosa/preputial skin grafts for urethral reconstruction. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 138, pp. 1096- 1098 ,(1987) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)43512-9
G. Lauer, Autografting of feeder-cell free cultured gingival epithelium: Method and clinical application Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 22, pp. 18- 22 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80291-4
Allen F. Morey, Jack W. McAninch, When and how to use buccal mucosal grafts in adult bulbar urethroplasty. Urology. ,vol. 48, pp. 194- 198 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00154-9
Russell W Neuhaus, Henry I. Baylis, Norman Shorr, Complications at Mucous Membrane Donor Sites American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 93, pp. 643- 646 ,(1982) , 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)77381-7
Graham Humby, T. Twistington Higgins, A one‐stage operation for hypospadias British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 29, pp. 84- 92 ,(1941) , 10.1002/BJS.18002911312