Retrograde Stem Removal Techniques in Revision Hip Surgery

作者: Kalman Toth

DOI: 10.5772/26297

关键词:

摘要: Total hip replacement has about a 50 year old past. In recent decades the number of revision arthroplasties in developed countries reached 15-20% primary replacements. The average survival for both cemented and uncemented implants is 94-95% at ten years. At end that period they have to be replaced. Removal well femoral stem total arthroplasty technically demanding procedure, which requires knowledge proficiency usage multitude surgical techniques instruments. Experiences with traditional cement removing been published numerous publications (Dennis et al., 1987; Ferguson, 1988; Laffargue 2000; Lauer 2002; Stuhmer, 1987). Femoral component failure fracture rarely seen complication, presents as difficult problem team. Because stress shielding proximal femur, osteolysis often concentrated part whilst distal portion might stable fixed. This eventually leads metal fracture. Although loose fragment relatively straightforward, tip difficult, only feasible result weakening biomechanical properties such fenestration i.e. creating small or larger window (in lateral cortex an extended trochanteric osteotomy (Wagner, 1989). Authors use retrograde technique clinical setting, removal performed nail passed through knee. With this technique, stems broken components possible – when case appropriate technique. Thus further compromise can avoided poor bone stock.

参考文章(52)
Daniel J. Berry, Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 30, pp. 183- 190 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70073-0
Miklós Szendröi, Kálmán Tóth, János Kiss, Imre Antal, Gábor Skaliczki, Retrograde genocephalic removal of fractured or immovable femoral stems in revision hip surgery Hip International. ,vol. 20, pp. 34- 37 ,(2010) , 10.1177/112070001002000105
B R Moed, J T Watson, Retrograde intramedullary nailing, without reaming, of fractures of the femoral shaft in multiply injured patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 77, pp. 1520- 1527 ,(1995) , 10.2106/00004623-199510000-00006
Engh Ca, McAuley Jp, Engh C, Surgical approaches for revision total hip replacement surgery: the anterior trochanteric slide and the extended conventional osteotomy. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 48, pp. 3- 8 ,(1999)
John J. Callaghan, Steven H. Elder, Steven K. Stranne, Chris F. Fulghum, Anthony V. Seaber, Barry S. Myers, Revision arthroplasty facilitated by ultrasonic tool cement removal. An evaluation of whole bone strength in a canine model. Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 7, pp. 495- 500 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80070-7
Robert Gardiner, William J. Hozack, Carl Nelson, E. Michael Keating, Revision total hip arthroplasty using ultrasonically driven tools. A clinical evaluation. Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 8, pp. 517- 521 ,(1993) , 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80217-2
S. Jingushi, Y. Noguchi, T. Shuto, T. Nakashima, Y. Iwamoto, A device for removal of femoral distal cement plug during hip revision arthroplasty: A high-powered drill equipped with a centralizer Journal of Arthroplasty. ,vol. 15, pp. 231- 233 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0883-5403(00)90374-7
J. N. WEINSTEIN, D. M. OSTER, J. B. PARK, S. H. PARK, S. LOENING, The effect of the extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor on the bone-cement interface in dogs Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. pp. 261- 267 ,(1988) , 10.1097/00003086-198810000-00025
MICHAEL M. TAYLOR, MARVIN H. MEYERS, J. PAUL HARVEY, Intraoperative femur fractures during total hip replacement. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. pp. 96- 103 ,(1978) , 10.1097/00003086-197811000-00013
Germ??n L Farfalli, Mart??n A Buttaro, Francisco Piccaluga, Femoral fractures in revision hip surgeries with impacted bone allograft. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. ,vol. 462, pp. 130- 136 ,(2007) , 10.1097/BLO.0B013E318137968C