Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.

作者: Chelsea N. Cook , Thiago Mosqueiro , Colin S. Brent , Cahit Ozturk , Jürgen Gadau

DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12911

关键词:

摘要: Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging divided between scouts, which tend explore landscape novel resources, recruits, exploit resources. Exploring variation in cognitive physiological mechanisms of behaviour will provide a deeper understanding how division labour regulated insect societies. Here, we uncover honeybee may be shaped predispositions performance latent inhibition (LI), form non-associative learning individuals learn ignore familiar information. We compared LI scouts hypothesizing differences would correlate with behaviour. Scouts seek out encounter many odours while locating recruits continuously forage from same resource, even as its quality degrades. found show stronger than possibly reflecting their need discriminate quality. also have significantly elevated tyramine recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, diminished octopamine brains scouts. These results suggest individual shapes phenotypic behavioural types foragers. turn important consequences colonies interact environment. Uncovering proximate influence crucial ecological context societies evolve.

参考文章(65)
Karl Von Frisch, Die Tänze der Bienen Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 3- 330 ,(1965) , 10.1007/978-3-642-94916-6_2
Tahira Farooqui, Kellie Robinson, Harald Vaessin, Brian H. Smith, Modulation of Early Olfactory Processing by an Octopaminergic Reinforcement Pathway in the Honeybee The Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 23, pp. 5370- 5380 ,(2003) , 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-12-05370.2003
Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, Steve Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 67, pp. 1- 48 ,(2015) , 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01
PEGGY S.M HILL, PATRICK H WELLS, HARRINGTON WELLS, Spontaneous flower constancy and learning in honey bees as a function of colour Animal Behaviour. ,vol. 54, pp. 615- 627 ,(1997) , 10.1006/ANBE.1996.0467
C. Wagener-Hulme, J. C. Kuehn, D. J. Schulz, G. E. Robinson, BIOGENIC AMINES AND DIVISION OF LABOR IN HONEY BEE COLONIES Journal of Comparative Physiology A-neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. ,vol. 184, pp. 471- 479 ,(1999) , 10.1007/S003590050347
Madeleine Beekman, How long will honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) be stimulated by scent to revisit past-profitable forage sites? Journal of Comparative Physiology A-neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. ,vol. 191, pp. 1115- 1120 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S00359-005-0033-1
Barron A., Schulz D., Robinson G., Octopamine modulates responsiveness to foraging-related stimuli in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of Comparative Physiology A-neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. ,vol. 188, pp. 603- 610 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00359-002-0335-5
Heather R. Mattila, Thomas D. Seeley, Does a polyandrous honeybee queen improve through patriline diversity the activity of her colony’s scouting foragers? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. ,vol. 65, pp. 799- 811 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S00265-010-1083-0