Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK

作者: J.Bradley Randleman , Buddy Russell , Michael A Ward , Keith P Thompson , R.Doyle Stulting

DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01727-X

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Purpose To review cases of corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), identify preoperative risk factors, and evaluate methods success rates visual rehabilitation for these cases. Design Retrospective nonrandomized comparative trial. Participants Ten eyes from seven patients identified as developing LASIK, 33 previously reported cases, two control groups with uneventful LASIK normal postoperative courses: 100 consecutive (first group), high myopia (> 8 diopters [D]) preoperatively (second group). Methods data each case compared that courses. Main outcome measures Preoperative refraction, topographic features, residual stromal bed thickness (RSB), time to the development ectasia, number enhancements, final best-corrected acuity (BCVA), method correction. Results Length follow-up averaged 23.4 months (range, 6–48 months) LASIK. Mean 16.3 1–45 months). refraction −8.69 D −5.37 first group ( P = 0.005). Preoperatively, 88% met criteria forme fruste keratoconus, 2% 0.0000001). Seven (70%) had RSB 0.0004) second (256.5 μm; 0.04). enhancements. Only 10% lost more than one line BCVA, all eventually achieved corrected vision 20/30 or better. One required penetrating keratoplasty (10%), while others rigid gas-permeable contact lenses Conclusions Significant factors include myopia, low RSB. All at least factor other significant differences remained even when controlling myopia. Multiple enhancements were common among affected but their causative role remains unknown. We did not any who developed without recognizable factors.

参考文章(29)
Yaron S Rabinowitz, Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 11, pp. 371- 379 ,(1995) , 10.3928/1081-597X-19950901-14
Peter J McDonnell, Yaron S Rabinowitz, Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 5, pp. 400- 408 ,(1989) , 10.3928/1081-597X-19891101-10
Timothy T. McMahon, Nicholas C. Caro, Stephen D. McLeod, Timothy A. Kisla, Iatrogenic Keratoconus: Corneal Ectasia Following Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia Archives of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 118, pp. 282- 284 ,(2000)
Konstantina Koufala, Gernot Richter, Theo Seiler, Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 14, pp. 312- 317 ,(1998) , 10.3928/1081-597X-19980501-15
S D Klyce, N Maeda, M K Smolek, H W Thompson, Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 35, pp. 2749- 2757 ,(1994)
Theo Seiler, Andreas W. Quurke, Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 24, pp. 1007- 1009 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80057-6
Vikram D Durairaj, Jennifer Balentine, Gregory Kouyoumdjian, Janet A Tooze, David Young, Lawrence Spivack, Michael J Taravella, The predictability of corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis Ophthalmology. ,vol. 107, pp. 2140- 2143 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00407-3
Ioannis G Pallikaris, George D Kymionis, Nikolaos I Astyrakakis, Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 27, pp. 1796- 1802 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01090-2
Troels T. Andreassen, Anders Hjorth Simonsen, Hans Oxlund, Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas Experimental Eye Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 435- 441 ,(1980) , 10.1016/S0014-4835(80)80027-3
Matthew B. Goren, Comparison of Methods for Detecting Keratoconus Using Videokeratography Archives of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 114, pp. 631- 632 ,(1996) , 10.1001/ARCHOPHT.1996.01100130623029