作者: Lutchmie Narine , T. R Einarson , D. S Yee , A. L Ilersich
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of abstracts original research articles. DESIGN: Blind, criterion-based survey. SAMPLE: Systematic sample 33 articles published in CMAJ 1989. MEASUREMENT: The was measured against a checklist evaluation criteria, which were divided into eight categories. A score for each abstract obtained by dividing number criteria present applicable. overall mean also determined. RESULTS: 0.63 (standard deviation 0.13) out 1. Of reporting study design 56% did not include specific technical descriptors. About 52% explicitly describe variables. In describing subject selection 79% failed to use terms. results 66% provide appropriate supporting data. those that gave conclusions 86% address limitations and 93% made no recommendations future study. CONCLUSION: Most provided some information pertaining criterion but detail sufficient enhance reader9s understanding article. On basis need improvement description design, results, statements recommendations. small from one journal absence comparison between contents limitations. Future studies should these issues compare traditional structured abstracts.