Effects of Installation Depth on Survival of an Hydroxyapatite-Coated Bicon Implant for Single-Tooth Restoration

作者: Eui-Hee Lee , Sun-Mi Ryu , Jwa-Young Kim , Byoung-Ouck Cho , Yong-Chan Lee

DOI: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2009.12.010

关键词:

摘要: Purpose The present retrospective study evaluated various implant surface factors associated with Bicon survival for single-tooth restoration in the healthy individual. Patients and Methods A cohort design was used. total of 613 (Bicon System, Boston, MA) implants (272 patients) were included. Because use hydroxyapatite (HA) coating has been controversial, type chosen according to patient's preference. 308 HA-coated 305 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) macroanatomy both types identical. who had systemic disease, poor quality bone, or removable prosthetics excluded from study. chart review conducted record age, gender, diameter, length, installation depth, location, bone grafting. Implant failure recorded, data analyzed using χ2 test logistic regression analysis. Results depth an important prognostic factor implants. rate installed at margin level 2 mm below 10.29% 3.01%, respectively (χ2 = 6.035, P .014). length TPS-treated recorded a less than 10 longer 15.46% 2.40%, 18.414, Conclusion Many can influence TPS Among these, played especially significant role success

参考文章(35)
Francisco E Pustiglioni, Ana V Imbronito, Tomas Albrektsson, Francisco F Todescan, Marco Gioso, Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 17, pp. 467- ,(2002)
Thomas B Dodson, Predictors of dental implant survival. Journal of the Massachusetts Dental Society. ,vol. 54, pp. 34- 38 ,(2006)
Edgerton M, Biesbrock Ar, Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants: a review of the literature. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 10, pp. 712- ,(1995)
O'Roark Wl, Survival rate of dental implants: an individual practitioner's anecdotal review of 25 years of experience. Journal of Oral Implantology. ,vol. 23, pp. 90- 103 ,(1997)
T Albrektsson, A R Eriksson, G Zarb, P Worthington, The Long-Term Efficacy of Currently Used Dental Implants: A Review and Proposed Criteria of Success International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. ,vol. 1, pp. 11- 25 ,(1986)
Carls E. Misch, Dental Implant Prosthetics ,(2004)
Joo L. Ong, Daniel C. N. Chan, Hydroxyapatite and their use as coatings in dental implants: a review. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. ,vol. 28, pp. 667- 707 ,(2000) , 10.1615/CRITREVBIOMEDENG.V28.I56.10
John K. Tidwell, Peter A. Blijdorp, Paul J.W. Stoelinga, John B. Brouns, Fred Hinderks, Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 21, pp. 204- 209 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80219-X
A. Ganguli, C. Steward, S. L. Butler, G. J. Philips, S. T. Meikle, A. W. Lloyd, M. H. Grant, Bacterial adhesion to bisphosphonate coated hydroxyapatite. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 16, pp. 283- 287 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S10856-005-0625-X