Interpreting abnormality: an EEG and MEG study of P50 and the auditory paired-stimulus paradigm.

作者: J.C Edgar , M.X Huang , M.P Weisend , A Sherwood , G.A Miller

DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00094-2

关键词:

摘要: Interpretation of neurophysiological differences between control and patient groups on the basis scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs), although common promising, is often complicated in absence information distinct neural generators contributing to ERP, particularly regarding individual generators. For example, while sensory gating frequently observed patients with schizophrenia P50 paired-click paradigm are typically interpreted as reflecting group generator source strength, latency and/or orientation may also account for differences. The present study examined how variability amplitude, or affects component ERP. In Experiment 1, simulations effect changes orientation, superior temporal gyrus (STG) dipoles recorded at Cz. 2, within- between-subject left right M50 STG dipole latency, was 19 subjects. Given reported anatomy function, substantial inter-subject inter-hemispheric these parameters were expected, important consequences Cz reflects activity from relevant simulated responses computed hypothetical left- right-hemisphere generators, varied systematically. electroencephalographic (EEG) magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected Generators modeled MEG assess illustrate evaluated parametrically 1. realistic amounts produced ERPs which scoring compromised interpretation complicated. significant within subject hemisphere sources. amplitude here nonpatient subjects, future studies should examine whether ratios vs. specific a particular hemisphere, well due combination parameters. Present analyses focused P50/M50 merely an example broader need evaluate scalp phenomena light underlying development widespread use EEG/MEG localization methods will greatly enhance value data.

参考文章(45)
Jeffrey David Lewine, William W. Orrison, CHAPTER 9 – Magnetoencephalography and Magnetic Source Imaging Functional Brain Imaging. pp. 369- 417 ,(1995) , 10.1016/B978-0-8151-6509-5.50013-8
Cesar Fernandez, Ralph F. Naunton, Evoked electrical activity in the auditory nervous system Academic Press. ,(1978)
William W Orrison, Jeffrey Lewine, John Sanders, Michael F Hartshorne, Functional brain imaging Mosby. ,(1995)
M Pecevich, M C Waldo, E Pachtman, L E Adler, R D Franks, R Freedman, Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry. ,vol. 17, pp. 639- 654 ,(1982)
Takashi Yoshiura, Shoogo Ueno, Keiji Iramina, Kouji Masuda, Source localization of middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields. Brain Research. ,vol. 703, pp. 139- 144 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01075-0
Marketa Hajek, Ralph Huonker, Clemens Boehle, Volz Hans-Peter, Hannes Nowak, Heinrich Sauer, Abnormalities of auditory evoked magnetic fields and structural changes in the left hemisphere of male schizophrenics—A magnetoencephalographic magnetic resonance imaging study Biological Psychiatry. ,vol. 42, pp. 609- 616 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0006-3223(96)00428-3
Hideaki Ninomiya, Toshiaki Onitsuka, Chung-Ho Chen, Naoko Kinukawa, Possible overlapping potentials of the auditory P50 in humans: factor analysis of middle latency auditory evoked potentials Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 104, pp. 23- 30 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)96026-8
R.J Erwin, J.S Buchwald, Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential recovery cycle characteristics. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 64, pp. 417- 423 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0013-4694(86)90075-1
C. Liégeois-Chauvel, A. Musolino, J.M. Badier, P. Marquis, P. Chauvel, Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man : evaluation and topography of the middle latency components Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. ,vol. 92, pp. 204- 214 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90064-7