Due dates in MOOCs: does stricter mean better?

作者: Sergiy O. Nesterko , Daniel Seaton , Justin Reich , Joseph McIntyre , Qiuyi Han

DOI: 10.1145/2556325.2567877

关键词:

摘要: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) employ a variety of components to engage students in learning (eg. videos, forums, quizzes). Some are graded, which means that they play key role student's final grade and certificate attainment. It is not yet clear how the due date structure graded affects student outcomes including academic performance alternative modes students. Using data from HarvardX MITx, Harvard's MIT's divisions for online learning, we study dates on 10 completed MOOCs. We find stricter associated with higher attainment rates but fewer who join late being able earn certificate. Our findings motivate further studies use deadlines MOOC students, can help inform design courses.

参考文章(4)
René F. Kizilcec, Chris Piech, Emily Schneider, Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses learning analytics and knowledge. pp. 170- 179 ,(2013) , 10.1145/2460296.2460330
Jennifer DeBoer, Andrew D. Ho, Glenda S. Stump, Lori Breslow, Changing “Course” Reconceptualizing Educational Variables for Massive Open Online Courses Educational Researcher. ,vol. 43, pp. 74- 84 ,(2014) , 10.3102/0013189X14523038
Lori Breslow, David E Pritchard, Jennifer DeBoer, Glenda S Stump, Andrew D Ho, Daniel T Seaton, None, Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX's First MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 13- 25 ,(2013)
Sergiy O. Nesterko, Daniel Seaton, Justin Reich, Joseph McIntyre, Qiuyi Han, Isaac Chuang, Andrew Ho, Due dates in MOOCs: does stricter mean better? Legal Studies. pp. 193- 194 ,(2014) , 10.1145/2556325.2567877