A comparison of the Sensititre® MYCOTB panel and the agar proportion method for the susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

作者: M. M. Abuali , R. Katariwala , V. J. LaBombardi

DOI: 10.1007/S10096-011-1382-Z

关键词:

摘要: The agar proportion method (APM) for determining Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibilities is a qualitative that requires 21 days in order to produce the results. Sensititre allows quantitative assessment. Our objective was compare accuracy, time results, and ease of use APM. 7H10 plates APM 96-well microtiter dry MYCOTB panels containing 12 antibiotics at full dilution ranges were inoculated with M. read colony growth. Thirty-seven clinical isolates tested using both methods 26 challenge strains blinded only. displayed 99.3% concordance provided reliable results on day 21, whereas consistent by 10. provides more rapid, quantitative, efficient testing first- second-line drugs when compared gold standard. It will give clinicians sense degree susceptibility, thus, guiding therapeutic decision-making process. Furthermore, microwell plate format without need instrumentation allow its resource-poor settings.

参考文章(10)
Victor Lorian, Antibiotics in laboratory medicine Published in <b>2005</b> in Philadelphia by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ,(2005)
D Behera, Global tuberculosis control 2010 Indian Journal of Medical Research. ,vol. 135, pp. 142- ,(2012)
R. A. Oberhelman, G. Soto-Castellares, L. Caviedes, M. E. Castillo, P. Kissinger, D. A.J. Moore, C. Evans, R. H. Gilman, Improved recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from children using the microscopic observation drug susceptibility method. Pediatrics. ,vol. 118, ,(2006) , 10.1542/PEDS.2005-2623
Ritu Banerjee, Gisela F Schecter, Jennifer Flood, Travis C Porco, Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: new strains, new challenges. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. ,vol. 6, pp. 713- 724 ,(2008) , 10.1586/14787210.6.5.713
Freddie Bwanga, Sven Hoffner, Melles Haile, Moses L Joloba, Direct susceptibility testing for multi drug resistant tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 9, pp. 67- 67 ,(2009) , 10.1186/1471-2334-9-67
Gemeda Abebe, Fabienne Paasch, Ludwig Apers, Leen Rigouts, Robert Colebunders, None, Tuberculosis drug resistance testing by molecular methods: Opportunities and challenges in resource limited settings Journal of Microbiological Methods. ,vol. 84, pp. 155- 160 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.MIMET.2010.11.014
Suhail Ahmad, Eiman Mokaddas, Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis Respiratory Medicine. ,vol. 103, pp. 1777- 1790 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.RMED.2009.07.010
M. V. Ramirez, K. C. Cowart, P. J. Campbell, G. P. Morlock, D. Sikes, J. M. Winchell, J. E. Posey, Process for detection of multidrug resistant tuberculosis using real-time pcr and high resolution melt analysis Journal of Clinical Microbiology. ,vol. 48, pp. 4003- 4009 ,(2011) , 10.1128/JCM.00812-10
G. Shiferaw, Y. Woldeamanuel, M. Gebeyehu, F. Girmachew, D. Demessie, E. Lemma, Evaluation of Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility Assay for Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Journal of Clinical Microbiology. ,vol. 45, pp. 1093- 1097 ,(2007) , 10.1128/JCM.01949-06