Comparing the Copenhagen Emissions Targets

作者: Frank Jotzo

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1878905

关键词:

摘要: Following the Copenhagen climate Accord, developed and developing countries have pledged to cut their greenhouse gas emissions, emissions intensity or relative baseline. This analysis puts targets for major on a common footing, compares them across different metrics. Targeted changes in absolute differ markedly between countries, with continued strong increases some but significant decreases others including Indonesia, Brazil South Africa, provided reasonable baseline projections are used. Differences smaller when expressed per capita terms. Reductions of economies implicit remarkably similar China's target spanning almost same range as reductions United States, EU, Japan, Australia Canada. deviations from business-as-usual also majority total global baselines may originate China other countries. The findings suggest that most broadly compatible important metrics, while overall ambition falls short two degree trajectory, by key can be considered commensurate context what pledged.

参考文章(19)
Joy P. Vazhayil, R. Balasubramanian, Copenhagen commitments and implications: A comparative analysis of India and China Energy Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 7442- 7450 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.08.026
Andrew Macintosh, Keeping warming within the 2 °C limit after Copenhagen Energy Policy. ,vol. 38, pp. 2964- 2975 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2010.01.034
Joeri Rogelj, Julia Nabel, Claudine Chen, William Hare, Kathleen Markmann, Malte Meinshausen, Michiel Schaeffer, Kirsten Macey, Niklas Höhne, None, Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry Nature. ,vol. 464, pp. 1126- 1128 ,(2010) , 10.1038/4641126A
Jane Qiu, China's climate target: is it achievable? Nature. ,vol. 462, pp. 550- 551 ,(2009) , 10.1038/462550A
Malte Meinshausen, Nicolai Meinshausen, William Hare, Sarah CB Raper, Katja Frieler, Reto Knutti, David J Frame, Myles R Allen, None, Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C Nature. ,vol. 458, pp. 1158- 1162 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NATURE08017
Michel G. J. den Elzen, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Jasper van Vliet, Postponing emission reductions from 2020 to 2030 increases climate risks and long-term costs Climatic Change. ,vol. 99, pp. 313- 320 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S10584-010-9798-5
Andreas Löschel, Andreas Lange, Carsten Vogt, Andreas Ziegler, Andreas Ziegler, On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations Social Science Research Network. ,(2009)
Karen Fisher-Vanden, Gary H. Jefferson, Hongmei Liu, Quan Tao, What is driving China's decline in energy intensity? Resource and Energy Economics. ,vol. 26, pp. 77- 97 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.RESENEECO.2003.07.002
Frank Jotzo, John CV Pezzey, None, Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty Environmental and Resource Economics. ,vol. 38, pp. 259- 284 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10640-006-9078-Z