The reality of media preferences: do professional groups vary in awareness?

作者: Joette Stefl-Mabry

DOI: 10.1002/ASI.20235

关键词:

摘要: This study is based on earlier research by the author that employed social judgment analysis (SJA; J. Stefl-Mabry, 2001, 2003) to identify information preferences held professional groups. explores extent which individuals, groups, and subgroups are self-aware of their profiles. Three specialized groups professionals--law enforcement, medicine, education--were chosen determine if preference profiles cluster around professions or demographic other background variables. As proliferation data continues increase, need understand users' media selection decisions tremendous value every industry, governmental agency, institution learning. In 1966, H. Menzel first raised concern about reliability self-assess, scientists continue explore issue competency in human judgment. To self-assessment regarding preferences, this examines individuals empirical they employ evaluating source scenarios. investigation congruence three professionals' self-reported as compared values, defined analysis.

参考文章(40)
Diane H. Sonnenwald, Perspectives of human information behaviour: contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons Exploring the contexts of information behaviour. pp. 176- 190 ,(1999)
Melvon L. Ankeny, Evaluating End-User Services: Success or Satisfaction? The Journal of Academic Librarianship. ,vol. 16, ,(1991)
Annica Brehmer, Berndt Brehmer, Chapter 3 What Have we Learned about Human Judgment from Thirty Years of Policy Capturing? Advances in Psychology. ,vol. 54, pp. 75- 114 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62171-8
Donald Thomas Campbell, Thomas D. Cook, Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings ,(1979)
Karen E Pettigrew, Raya Fidel, Harry Bruce, None, Conceptual Frameworks in Information Behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). ,vol. 35, pp. 43- 78 ,(2001)