Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste.

作者: Peter C. Slorach , Harish K. Jeswani , Rosa Cuéllar-Franca , Adisa Azapagic

DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2019.02.001

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Consumers are the leading producers of food waste (FW) in developed countries and majority household FW is still embedded general where it incinerated or landfilled. There increasing awareness value collecting as a separate stream for production compost recovery energy through anaerobic digestion (AD). This study focuses on AD to evaluate life cycle environmental sustainability recovering fertilisers from UK. The analysis carried out two different functional units: i) treatment 1 tonne FW, which compared incineration landfilling; ii) generation 1 MWh electricity, other electricity options. former results net negative greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (−39 kg CO2-eq./t) primary demand (−2 GJ/t) due displacement grid mineral fertilisers. has lower impacts than both landfilling across 15 19 impacts. However, application digestate land release ammonia nitrates lead higher marine eutrophication (ME), terrestrial acidification (TA) particulate matter formation (PMF). For second unit, emits 203 kg CO2-eq./MWh, 357 kg CO2-eq./MWh UK mix. Compared renewables, such wind solar, demand, toxicity potentials metal depletion. global warming potential, ME, TA PMF. At level, treating 4.9 Mt kerbside collected annually could provide 0.37% national save 190,000 t CO2-eq./yr electricity. produced displace 1% industrial nitrogen Although small fractions demands, they represent valuable return largely unutilised help towards implementation circular economy.

参考文章(36)
John W. Hackney, Capital Cost Estimating Chemical Engineering Design. pp. 307- 354 ,(2013) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-096659-5.00007-9
Valentina Fantin, Antonio Giuliano, Michele Manfredi, Giuseppe Ottaviano, Milena Stefanova, Paolo Masoni, Environmental assessment of electricity generation from an Italian anaerobic digestion plant Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 83, pp. 422- 435 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2015.10.015
Charles J. Banks, Michael Chesshire, Sonia Heaven, Rebecca Arnold, Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: Performance assessment by mass and energy balance Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 102, pp. 612- 620 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2010.08.005
Sara Evangelisti, Paola Lettieri, Domenico Borello, Roland Clift, None, Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: A UK case study Waste Management. ,vol. 34, pp. 226- 237 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2013.09.013
A. Bernstad, J. la Cour Jansen, A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste - A Swedish full-scale case study Waste Management. ,vol. 31, pp. 1879- 1896 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2011.02.026
Xiaohui Guo, Cheng Wang, Faqian Sun, Weijing Zhu, Weixiang Wu, A comparison of microbial characteristics between the thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digesters exposed to elevated food waste loadings. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 152, pp. 420- 428 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.11.012
Stefan Muench, Edeltraud Guenther, A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments Applied Energy. ,vol. 112, pp. 257- 273 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2013.06.001
Mattias Eriksson, Ingrid Strid, Per-Anders Hansson, Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy – a Swedish case study Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 93, pp. 115- 125 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2015.01.026
Zeshan, Chettiyappan Visvanathan, Evaluation of anaerobic digestate for greenhouse gas emissions at various stages of its management International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. ,vol. 95, pp. 167- 175 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.IBIOD.2014.06.020
N. Tippayawong, P. Thanompongchart, Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor Energy. ,vol. 35, pp. 4531- 4535 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2010.04.014