Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures

作者: John WM Bastiaansen , Albart Coster , Mario PL Calus , Johan AM van Arendonk , Henk Bovenhuis

DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-3

关键词:

摘要: Background: Genomic selection has become an important tool in the genetic improvement of animals and plants. The objective this study was to investigate impacts breeding value estimation method, reference population structure, trait architecture, on long-term response genomic without updating marker effects. Methods: Three methods were used estimate values: a BLUP method with relationships estimated from genome-wide markers (GBLUP), Bayesian partial least squares regression (PLSR). A shallow (individuals one generation) or deep five generations) each method. effects different approaches compared under four architectures for selection. Selection based three values, pedigree performed at random. continued ten generations. Results: Differences small. For architecture very small number quantitative loci (QTL), achieved that 0.05 0.1 standard deviation higher than other generation 10. approximately 30 300 QTL, PLSR (shallow reference) GBLUP (deep had average advantage 0.2 over resulted 0.6% 0.9% less inbreeding BM third smaller reduction variance. Responses early generations greater while not affected by structure. Conclusions: ranking Under selection, applying led lower variance similar achieved. structure limited effect accuracy response. Use population, most closely related candidates, gave benefits later generations, when updated, deeper did pay off.

参考文章(31)
C Patry, Vincent Ducrocq, None, Evidence of a bias in genetic evaluation due to genomic selection Interbull Bulletin. pp. 167- ,(2009)
E Mullaart, C Schrooten, G de Jong, A de Roos, S van der Beek, W Voskamp, Genomic selection at CRV Interbull Bulletin. pp. 47- ,(2009)
T. H. E. Meuwissen, M. E. Goddard, B. J. Hayes, Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps Genetics. ,vol. 157, pp. 1819- 1829 ,(2001) , 10.1093/GENETICS/157.4.1819
Sijmen de Jong, SIMPLS: an alternative approach to partial least squares regression Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. ,vol. 18, pp. 251- 263 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0169-7439(93)85002-X
M.E. Goddard, B.J. Hayes, Genomic selection: Genomic selection Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. ,vol. 124, pp. 323- 330 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1439-0388.2007.00702.X
D. Habier, R. L. Fernando, J. C. M. Dekkers, The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values Genetics. ,vol. 177, pp. 2389- 2397 ,(2007) , 10.1534/GENETICS.107.081190
J. C. M. Dekkers, Marker-assisted selection for commercial crossbred performance. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 85, pp. 2104- 2114 ,(2007) , 10.2527/JAS.2006-683
Elliot L. Heffner, Mark E. Sorrells, Jean-Luc Jannink, Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement Crop Science. ,vol. 49, pp. 1- 12 ,(2009) , 10.2135/CROPSCI2008.08.0512