Sonographic follow-up after endoscopic carpal tunnel release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome: a one-year neuroanatomical prospective observational study

作者: Miao Li , Jue Jiang , Qi Zhou , Chen Zhang

DOI: 10.1186/S12891-019-2548-6

关键词:

摘要: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) has been gradually adopted for the treatment of severe syndrome (CTS). However, perioperative assessment neuroanatomical parameters median nerve, which are important determinant nerve recovery, rarely reported. This one-year prospective study aimed to investigate natural history morphology after ECTR in CTS patients by high-frequency ultrasonography and assess ability measures quantify morphological recovery ECTR. recruited 31 (44 wrists) with a definitive diagnosis underwent operation. The edema length (EL) from inlet proximal wrist was detected on long axis imaging plane anteroposterior diameter (D) cross-sectional area (CSA) at short were high frequency ultrasound. All these metrics 3 days before surgery 2nd week, 4th 3rd month, 6th month 12th separately. There no significant difference each parameter between 2-week postoperative (1.914 ± 0.598 cm EL, 0.258 ± 0.039 cm D 0.138 ± 0.015 cm2 CSA) 3-days preoperative time points (P-EL =0.250; P-D = 0.125; P-CSA =0.712). From fourth week third surgery, quickly improved. EL (0.715 ± 0.209 cm), (0.225 ± 0.017 cm) CSA (0.117 ± 0.012 cm2) 3- more reduced than < 0.001; P-D = 0.038; =0.014). Thereafter, neurological anatomy recovered slowly. By 12-month points, three neuroanatomically close normal. Compared control group (0.213 ± 0.005 cm), there point (0.214 ± 0.009 cm, P = 0.939). (0.098 ± 0.030 cm vs. 0.016 ± 0.011 cm) (0.103 ± 0.008 cm2 0.073 ± 0.005 cm2) healthy volunteers still existed < 0.001). Neuroanatomical improved surgery. best US follow up is 3-month who do not show clinical improvement, since this change greatest most patients. registered Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR-ROC-17014068 (retrospectively 20-12-2017).

参考文章(33)
Lisa Newington, E. Clare Harris, Karen Walker-Bone, CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME AND WORK Best Practice & Research: Clinical Rheumatology. ,vol. 29, pp. 440- 453 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BERH.2015.04.026
Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad, Emad Nosair, Andrea Vegh, Afshin Mohammadi, Adam Akkad, Emal Lesha, Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi, Doaa Sayed, Ali Davarian, Tooraj Maleki-Miyandoab, Anwarul Hasan, A handy review of carpal tunnel syndrome: From anatomy to diagnosis and treatment. World Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 6, pp. 284- 300 ,(2014) , 10.4329/WJR.V6.I6.284
T J Galla, R E Horch, C H Lücking, H El-Karabaty, F X Glocker, A Hetzel, The effect of carpal tunnel release on median nerve flattening and nerve conduction. Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. ,vol. 45, pp. 223- 227 ,(2005)
S.-H. Park, B. H. Cho, K. S. Ryu, B. M. Cho, S. M. Oh, D. S. Park, Surgical outcome of endoscopic carpal tunnel release in 100 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. ,vol. 47, pp. 261- 265 ,(2004) , 10.1055/S-2004-830075
Eli T. Sayegh, Robert J. Strauch, Open versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. ,vol. 473, pp. 1120- 1132 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11999-014-3835-Z
Federica Ginanneschi, David Cioncoloni, Jacopo Bigliazzi, Marco Bonifazi, Cosimo Lorè, Alessandro Rossi, Sensory axons excitability changes in carpal tunnel syndrome after neural mobilization Neurological Sciences. ,vol. 36, pp. 1611- 1615 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10072-015-2218-X
P. SEROR, Nerve Conduction Studies after Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). ,vol. 17, pp. 641- 645 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90191-4
CA Abicalaf, N De Barros, RA Sernik, BF Pimentel, A Braga-Baiak, L Braga, P Houvet, J-L Brasseur, B Roger, GG Cerri, None, Ultrasound evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome before and after endoscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament Clinical Radiology. ,vol. 62, pp. 891- 894 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.CRAD.2007.01.029
M. Chammas, Carpal tunnel syndrome. Chirurgie De La Main. ,vol. 33, pp. 75- 94 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.MAIN.2013.11.010