Information use in group decision making teams
作者： Lu Xiao , Vanessa Eastmure
DOI: 10.1002/MEET.2014.14505101093
关键词:
摘要: We reviewed 22 papers to identify the most prominently studied factors related information use in group decision making processes and explore research gaps this topic. identified eight main of process: sense identity diversity, heterogeneity or homogeneity, task perception, personality/individual viewpoints; access information, argument analysis, communication medium, rule. Our literature review suggested several directions: investigations members’ motivations sharing information; studies that mixed methods examine a topic; exploration various modes besides verbal written channels.
syr.edu参考文章(26)
Thomas Daniel Wilson, Information Sharing: An Exploration of the Literature and Some Propositions. Information Research. ,vol. 15, pp. 12- ,(2010)
Samuel T. Shelton, Jury Decision Making: Using Group Theory to Improve Deliberation Politics & Policy. ,vol. 34, pp. 706- 725 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1747-1346.2006.00037.X
Roby D. Robertson, Small group decision making: The uncertain role of information in reducing uncertainty Political Behavior. ,vol. 2, pp. 163- 188 ,(1980) , 10.1007/BF00989889
T.S. Raghu, R. Ramesh, Andrew B. Whinston, Addressing the homeland security problem: A collaborative decision‐making framework Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 56, pp. 310- 324 ,(2005) , 10.1002/ASI.20123
Poppy Lauretta McLeod, Distributed People and Distributed Information Vigilant Decision-Making in Virtual Teams Small Group Research. ,vol. 44, pp. 627- 657 ,(2013) , 10.1177/1046496413500696
Michael B. Spring, Vichita Vathanophas, Peripheral social awareness information in collaborative work Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 54, pp. 1006- 1013 ,(2003) , 10.1002/ASI.10305
John S. Carroll, Sachi Hatakenaka, Jenny W. Rudolph, Naturalistic Decision Making and Organizational Learning in Nuclear Power Plants: Negotiating Meaning Between Managers and Problem Investigation Teams Organization Studies. ,vol. 27, pp. 1037- 1057 ,(2006) , 10.1177/0170840606065709
Arvind Karunakaran, Madhu C. Reddy, Patricia Ruma Spence, Toward a model of collaborative information behavior in organizations Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 64, pp. 2437- 2451 ,(2013) , 10.1002/ASI.22943
Theodore E. Zorn, Juliet Roper, Kirsten Broadfoot, C. Kay Weaver, Focus Groups as Sites of Influential Interaction: Building Communicative Self-Efficacy and Effecting Attitudinal Change in Discussing Controversial Topics Journal of Applied Communication Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 115- 140 ,(2006) , 10.1080/00909880600573965
Joseph L. Bower, Group decision making: A report of an experimental study Behavioral Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 277- 289 ,(1965) , 10.1002/BS.3830100306