Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. III. Role of binding and metabolism.

作者: Laurence T. Baxter , Rakesh K. Jain

DOI: 10.1016/0026-2862(91)90003-T

关键词:

摘要: Abstract We have previously developed a general theoretical framework for transvascular exchange and extravascular transport of fluid macromolecules in tumors. The model was first applied to homogeneous, alymphatic tumor, with no binding ( Baxter Jain, 1989 ). For nonbinding molecules the interstitial pressure found be major contributing factor heterogeneous distribution within solid A steep gradient predicted at periphery verified recent experiments. second paper this series looked role perfusion lymphatics on concentration profiles 1990 present work presents specific metabolism macromolecular uptake distribution. In investigation IgG its fragment, Fab, were modeled convective-diffusion equation which includes as well exchange. effects molecular weight, affinity, antigen density, initial dose, plasma clearance, vascular permeability, metabolism, necrosis considered. An expression optimal affinity derived. main conclusion is that an antibody highest possible should used except when: (i) there are significant necrotic regions; (ii) diffusive permeability very small; (iii) uniform required microscopic scale. concentrations achieved by continuous infusion, but specificity ratio bolus injections. Antibody reduces both total ratio, especially later times. addition, amount material sequestered core. Our compared three previous models literature. Unlike models, combines nonuniform filtration, binding, determine macroscopic profiles. addition supporting conclusions, our offers some new strategies therapy.

参考文章(25)
Peter L. Jones, Howard Sands, Beverly A. Brown, Uptake and Metabolism of 111In-labeled Monoclonal Antibody B6.2 by the Rat Liver Cancer Research. ,vol. 50, ,(1990)
Rakesh K. Jain, Michelle A. Clauss, Interstitial Transport of Rabbit and Sheep Antibodies in Normal and Neoplastic Tissues Cancer Research. ,vol. 50, pp. 3487- 3492 ,(1990)
John Crank, The mathematics of diffusion ,(1956)
John N. Weinstein, Oscar D. Holton, Andrew M. Keenan, Susan M. Sieber, David G. Covell, Michael A. Steller, Robert J. Parker, Optimization of Monoclonal Antibody Delivery via the Lymphatics:The Dose Dependence Cancer Research. ,vol. 46, pp. 1830- 1834 ,(1986)
Alan L. Epstein, Feng-Ming Chen, Clive R. Taylor, A novel method for the detection of necrotic lesions in human cancers. Cancer Research. ,vol. 48, pp. 5842- 5848 ,(1988)
J. Weinstein, R. Parker, A. Keenan, S. Dower, H. Morse, S. Sieber, Monoclonal anitbodies in the lymphatics: toward the diagnosis and therapy of tumor metastases Science. ,vol. 218, pp. 1334- 1337 ,(1982) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.7146917
Hidemitsu Nakagawa, Dennis R. Groothuis, Ernest S. Owens, Joseph D. Fenstermacher, Clifford S. Patlak, Ronald G. Blasberg, Dexamethasone effects on [125I]albumin distribution in experimental RG-2 gliomas and adjacent brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. ,vol. 7, pp. 687- 701 ,(1987) , 10.1038/JCBFM.1987.123
Leonard E. Gerlowski, Rakesh K. Jain, Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. Microvascular Research. ,vol. 31, pp. 288- 305 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0026-2862(86)90018-X
Rakesh K. Jain, Delivery of Novel Therapeutic Agents in Tumors: Physiological Barriers and Strategies Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 81, pp. 570- 576 ,(1990) , 10.1093/JNCI/81.8.570