Improbable outcomes: Infrequent or extraordinary?

作者: Karl Halvor Teigen , Marie Juanchich , Anine H. Riege

DOI: 10.1016/J.COGNITION.2012.12.005

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Research on verbal probabilities has shown that unlikely or improbable events are believed to correspond numerical probability values between 10% and 30%. However, building a pragmatic approach of new methodology, the present paper shows outcomes most often associated with have 0% frequency occurrence. Five studies provide evidence when people complete evaluate statements describing “improbable” outcomes, based outcome distributions expected ranges, they favor extraordinary not occurred in original sample. For quantitative can be ordered unipolar dimension, an is typically perceived as having higher value than those observed. Thus battery life for sample laptop batteries range from 2.5 4.5 h, 5 6 h considered better examples duration times actually occur cases. Similarly, exam grade one yet been observed, rather obtained by small percentage students. And climate experts claim 100 cm increase sea level year 2100 “improbable”, participants believe same experts’ maximum estimates will much lower. We conclude judgments what suggest beyond range, simply low outcomes. These results compatible causal (propensity) interpretation statistical (frequency) probabilities.

参考文章(64)
K. R. Popper, A World of Propensities. Two New Views of Causality Ruch filozoficzny. ,vol. 46, pp. 361- 373 ,(1989)
Karl Halvor Teigen, Petra Filkuková, Can > Will: Predictions of What Can Happen are Extreme, but Believed to be Probable Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. ,vol. 26, pp. 68- 78 ,(2013) , 10.1002/BDM.761
Marie Juanchich, Karl Halvor Teigen, Gaëlle Villejoubert, Is guilt 'likely' or 'not certain'? Contrast with previous probabilities determines choice of verbal terms. Acta Psychologica. ,vol. 135, pp. 267- 277 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2010.04.016
David V. Budescu, Thomas S. Wallsten, Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical Evidence Psychology of Learning and Motivation. ,vol. 32, pp. 275- 318 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60313-8
Timothy S. Doupnik, Martin Richter, Interpretation of uncertainty expressions: a cross-national study Accounting Organizations and Society. ,vol. 28, pp. 15- 35 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00010-7
David A. Lagnado, Steven A. Sloman, Inside and Outside Probability Judgment In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. (pp. 155-176). (2008). pp. 155- 176 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470752937.CH8
Marie Juanchich, Karl Halvor Teigen, Amélie Gourdon, Top scores are possible, bottom scores are certain (and middle scores are not worth mentioning) : a pragmatic view of verbal probabilities Judgment and Decision Making. ,vol. 8, pp. 345- 364 ,(2013)
Adam J. L. Harris, Adam Corner, Communicating environmental risks: Clarifying the severity effect in interpretations of verbal probability expressions Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 37, pp. 1571- 1578 ,(2011) , 10.1037/A0024195
David V Budescu, Thomas S Wallsten, Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 36, pp. 391- 405 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90007-X