ClimMIT - Climate change mitigation with CCS and CCU technologies
作者： Gunnar Nurk , Oliver Järvik , Can Rüstü Yörük , Mai Uibu , Kalle Kirsimäe
DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3812288
关键词:
摘要: The ClimMIT project was funded by Estonian Research Council from National Programme for Addressing Socio-Economic Challenges through R&D (RITA), which is supported the Government and European Regional Development Fund April 2019 to 2021. (https://www.taltech.ee/climmit) aims assess feasibility of investing in carbon capture infrastructure minimise greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) oil shale industry Estonia. main technological deliverables include analysis recommendations on measures potential implementation technologies utilisation dioxide Estonia’s public private sectors. economy has, per capita, one highest GHG emission rates carbon-intensity levels Union. To decrease emissions, best options implementing utilization (CCU) must be worked out. goal suitability existing CCU develop scenarios adopting these sector. results a multifaceted overview help minimize
sci-hub.st 参考文章(16)
Julie Rozenberg, Adrien Vogt-Schilb, Stephane Hallegatte, Transition to clean capital, irreversible investment and stranded assets Social Science Research Network. pp. 1- 29 ,(2014) , 10.1596/1813-9450-6859
Zongguo Wen, Xuan Zhang, Xuewei Yu, Jinghan Di, Technology options for reducing CO2 in China's electricity sector in 2010–2030: From the perspective of internal and social costs Greenhouse Gases-Science and Technology. ,vol. 5, pp. 772- 785 ,(2015) , 10.1002/GHG.1525
Kaia Kask, Conceptual Framework for Measurement and Application of Public Sector Opportunity Cost of Capital International journal trade, economics and finance. pp. 114- 117 ,(2014) , 10.7763/IJTEF.2014.V5.351
Aaro Hazak, Companies' Financial Decisions Under the Distributed Profit Taxation Regime of Estonia Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. ,vol. 45, pp. 4- 12 ,(2009) , 10.2753/REE1540-496X450401
Diana Ürge-Vorsatz, Sergio Tirado Herrero, Navroz K. Dubash, Franck Lecocq, Measuring the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Annual Review of Environment and Resources. ,vol. 39, pp. 549- 582 ,(2014) , 10.1146/ANNUREV-ENVIRON-031312-125456
Reyer Gerlagh, Bob van der Zwaan, Options and Instruments for a Deep Cut in CO2 Emissions: Carbon Dioxide Capture or Renewables, Taxes or Subsidies? The Energy Journal. ,vol. 27, pp. 25- 48 ,(2006) , 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-VOL27-NO3-3
Tuong-Van Nguyen, Laurence Tock, Peter Breuhaus, François Maréchal, Brian Elmegaard, CO2-mitigation options for the offshore oil and gas sector Applied Energy. ,vol. 161, pp. 673- 694 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.09.088
Geoffrey P. Hammond, Áine O’Grady, Indicative energy technology assessment of UK shale gas extraction Applied Energy. ,vol. 185, pp. 1907- 1918 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2016.02.024
Andrea Baranzini, Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh, Stefano Carattini, Richard B. Howarth, Emilio Padilla, Jordi Roca, Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 8, ,(2017) , 10.1002/WCC.462
Carolyn Fischer, Louis Preonas, Richard G. Newell, Environmental and Technology Policy Options in the Electricity Sector: Are We Deploying Too Many? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. ,vol. 4, pp. 959- 984 ,(2017) , 10.1086/692507