Black bear recolonization patterns in a human-dominated landscape vary based on housing: New insights from spatially explicit density models

作者: Michael J. Evans , Tracy A.G. Rittenhouse , Jason E. Hawley , Paul W. Rego

DOI: 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2017.01.009

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Housing development is often intermixed within natural land cover, creating coupled human-natural systems that benefit some species, while eliminating critical habitat for others. As carnivore populations recover and expand in North America, understanding how may recolonize human-dominated landscapes an important goal conservation. We empirically test whether a population of American black bear ( Ursus americanus ) recolonizing developed landscape responding to housing density, or the amount intermixture between forest as quantified by Wildland Urban Interface. density was most supported spatially explicit mark-recapture model indicated highest among exurban densities. Mean estimated areas (6–49 houses/km 2 0.18 individuals/km compared 0.12 individuals/km rural ). Bear densities also declined zero approached 50 houses/km . tested differences sex ratio more less intensely areas, using hybrid mixture models. Sex ratios were significantly male-biased higher density. Elevated provide evidence land-use can facilitate recolonization bears, yet high limit recovery populations. Explicit relationships will allow managers anticipate future distribution, where bears people come into frequent contact.

参考文章(71)
Richard F. Johnston, Synanthropic birds of North America Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 49- 67 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9_3
William Z. Lidicker, Jr., Responses of mammals to habitat edges: an overview Landscape Ecology. ,vol. 14, pp. 333- 343 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1008056817939
H.E. Johnson, S.W. Breck, S. Baruch-Mordo, D.L. Lewis, C.W. Lackey, K.R. Wilson, J. Broderick, J.S. Mao, J.P. Beckmann, Shifting perceptions of risk and reward: Dynamic selection for human development by black bears in the western United States Biological Conservation. ,vol. 187, pp. 164- 172 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.04.014
Stanley D. Gehrt, Brian L. Cypher, Seth P. D. Riley, Urban carnivores : ecology, conflict, and conservation Johns Hopkins University Press. ,(2010)
Lori S. Eggert, Jesús E. Maldonado, Robert C. Fleischer, Nucleic Acid Isolation from Ecological Samples—Animal Scat and Other Associated Materials Methods in Enzymology. ,vol. 395, pp. 73- 87 ,(2005) , 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95006-4
P. W. Bateman, P. A. Fleming, Big city life: carnivores in urban environments Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 287, pp. 1- 23 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1469-7998.2011.00887.X
Steven Dobey, Brian K. Scheick, Melvin E. Sunquist, Joseph D. Clark, Darrin V. Masters, Michael R. Pelton, Ecology of Florida black bears in the Okefenokee-Osceola ecosystem. Wildlife Monographs. ,vol. 158, pp. 1- 41 ,(2005) , 10.2193/0084-0173(2005)158[1:EOFBBI]2.0.CO;2
Marcel Cardillo, Andy Purvis, Wes Sechrest, John L Gittleman, Jon Bielby, Georgina M Mace, Human Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores PLoS Biology. ,vol. 2, pp. e197- ,(2004) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.0020197
Tom A. Waite, Anil K. Chhangani, Lesley G. Campbell, Lal S. Rajpurohit, Surendra M. Mohnot, Sanctuary in the City: Urban Monkeys Buffered against Catastrophic Die-off during ENSO-related Drought Ecohealth. ,vol. 4, pp. 278- 286 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10393-007-0112-6
Andrew J. Hansen, Richard L. Knight, John M. Marzluff, Scott Powell, Kathryn Brown, Patricia H. Gude, Kingsford Jones, EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS Ecological Applications. ,vol. 15, pp. 1893- 1905 ,(2005) , 10.1890/05-5221