Beyond Neocorporatism? Transdisciplinary Case Studies as a Means for Collaborative Learning in Sustainable Development

作者: Michael Stauffacher

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_12

关键词:

摘要: Stakeholder involvement in political decision processes is sometimes claimed being a corporatist arrangement – generally with pejorative connotation. Answering this claim, I first review the discussion of neocorporatism. Secondly, present our own work, Transdisciplinary Case Study (TdCS). Through design, we initiate and foster collaborative learning sustainable development. discuss if TdCS design can be understood as neocorporatist arrangement. In literal classical understanding not case. broader process understanding, resembles like interest mediation. Yet, it goes well beyond: larger number stakeholder groups involved; role played by science emphasized; conceptualized more than negotiation. conclude showing some implications from macrosociological perspective for work. will pay special emphasis to crucial role(s) plays.

参考文章(75)
Wolfgang Streeck, Lane Kenworthy, Theories and practices of neocorporatism The handbook of political sociology: states, civil societies, and globalization. pp. 441- 460 ,(2005) , 10.1017/CBO9780511818059.024
Gerhard Lehmbruch, Liberal Corporatism and Party Government Comparative Political Studies. ,vol. 10, pp. 68- 102 ,(1977) , 10.1007/978-3-322-80515-7_4
Tore Sager, Communicative planning theory Ashgate Publishing. ,(1994)
M. Stauffacher, A.I. Walter, D.J. Lang, A. Wiek, R.W. Scholz, Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio‐cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. ,vol. 7, pp. 252- 275 ,(2006) , 10.1108/14676370610677838