Comparison of postoperative pain after open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled study.
作者： Tolga Onay , MehmetMufit Orak , SeyitAli Gumustas , Serkan Uludag , Guven Bulut
关键词: Randomized controlled trial 、 Carpal tunnel surgery 、 Orthopedic surgery 、 Surgery 、 Wrist 、 Endoscopic carpal tunnel release 、 Medicine 、 Visual analogue scale 、 Intravenous anesthesia 、 Carpal tunnel syndrome 、 Anesthesia
摘要: Background: Results of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery were compared with many studies done previously. To the best our knowledge, difference in pain after release (ECTR) (OCTR) has not been objectively documented literature. The aim study was to compare intensity early postoperative period patients undergoing OCTR versus those ECTR. Materials Methods: Fifty diagnosed syndrome randomized into two groups using “random number generator” software (Research Randomizer, version 3.0); group [(21 female, 1 male; mean age 49 years (range 31–64 years)] [(25 3 45.1 29–68 received release. Surgery performed under regional intravenous anesthesia. patients' level assessed at st , 2 nd 4 th 24 hours a visual analog scale (VAS) score. Results: Mean age, gender duration symptoms found similar for both groups. Boston functional scores improved ( P revealed significantly low VAS = 0.003, Conclusion: Endoscopic is an effective treatment method vis-a-vis relief.
core.ac.uk
springer.com
ijoonline.com 参考文章(22)
Paolo Quaglietta, G. Corriero, Endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery: retrospective study of 390 consecutive cases Advanced Peripheral Nerve Surgery and Minimal Invasive Spinal Surgery. ,vol. 92, pp. 41- 45 ,(2005) , 10.1007/3-211-27458-8_10
Toshiro Futami, Surgery for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome Endoscopic and open release compared in 10 patients Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. ,vol. 66, pp. 153- 155 ,(1995) , 10.3109/17453679508995510
Kyung Sik Ryu, Sae Moon Oh, Se-Hyuck Park, Byung Moon Cho, Byung-Cheol Kim, Bong Hwang Cho, Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release : Surgical Outcome in 100 Cases ,(2004)
K. C. Wong, L. K. Hung, P. C. Ho, J. M. W. Wong, Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. ,vol. 85, pp. 863- 868 ,(2003) , 10.1302/0301-620X.85B6.13759
J. G. B. MacLean, R. D. Ferdinand, Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED, BLINDED ASSESSMENT Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume. ,vol. 84, pp. 375- 379 ,(2002) , 10.1302/0301-620X.84B3.12224
R A Brown, R H Gelberman, J G Seiler, S O Abrahamsson, A J Weiland, J R Urbaniak, D A Schoenfeld, D Furcolo, Carpal tunnel release : a prospective, randomized assessment of open and endoscopic methods Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 75, pp. 1265- 1275 ,(1993) , 10.2106/00004623-199309000-00002
Nicole Einhorn, Joseph P. Leddy, PITFALLS OF ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE Orthopedic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 27, pp. 373- 380 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)32080-0
Thomas E. Trumble, Edward Diao, Reid A. Abrams, Mary M. Gilbert-Anderson, Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release : a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 84, pp. 1107- 1115 ,(2002) , 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00003
Hiroyuki Hashizume, Hajime Inoue, Masuo Senda, Akira Kawai, Kenya Hasegawa, Evaluation of release surgery for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: endoscopic versus open method. Acta Medica Okayama. ,vol. 53, pp. 179- 183 ,(1999) , 10.18926/AMO/31614
Kutay Engin Ozturan, Erkut Karaca, Mehmet Subasi, Tolga Tuzuner, The use of local anesthesia in endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. ,vol. 39, pp. 35- 38 ,(2005)