Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods.

作者: Ravi Dhar , Klaus Wertenbroch

DOI: 10.1509/JMKR.37.1.60.18718

关键词: Salience (language)MicroeconomicsLoss aversionConsumer choiceField surveyEconomicsMarket priceValue (economics)

摘要: In this article, the authors examine how consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods is influenced by the nature of the decision task. Building on research on elaboration, the authors propose that the relative salience of hedonic dimensions is greater when consumers decide which of several items to give up (forfeiture choices) than when they decide which item to acquire (acquisition choices). The resulting hypothesis that a hedonic item is relatively preferred over the same utilitarian item in forfeiture choices than in …

参考文章(43)
Neal J. Roese, James M. Olson, Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 29, pp. 1- 59 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60015-5
Barbara E. Kahn, Robert J. Meyer, Consumer Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute-Weight Uncertainty Journal of Consumer Research. ,vol. 17, pp. 508- 522 ,(1991) , 10.1086/208574
Daniel Kahneman, Dale T. Miller, Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives Psychological Review. ,vol. 93, pp. 136- 153 ,(1986) , 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
Lawrence J. Sanna, Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 71, pp. 1020- 1036 ,(1996) , 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.1020
Mark Spranca, Elisa Minsk, Jonathan Baron, Omission and commission in judgment and choice Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 76- 105 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T
Punam Anand Keller, Ann L. McGill, Differences in the Relative Influence of Product Attributes Under Alternative Processing Conditions Journal of Consumer Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 29- 49 ,(1994) , 10.1207/S15327663JCP0301_02
Murray G. Millar, Abraham Tesser, Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude–behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 51, pp. 270- 276 ,(1986) , 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.270
Paul Slovic, B Fischhoff, S Lichtenstein, Contingent weighting in judgment and choice Psychological Review. ,vol. 95, pp. 371- 384 ,(1988) , 10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371