A comparison of the environmental benefits of bagasse-derived electricity and fuel ethanol on a life-cycle basis

作者: Tyron Botha , Harro von Blottnitz

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2004.12.017

关键词: Fossil fuelLife-cycle assessmentBioenergyEnergy supplyBiofuelEfficient energy useBagasseRenewable energyWaste managementEngineering

摘要: Abstract The energetic utilisation of agricultural residues is considered to be an important element in any strategy achieve renewable energy targets. In the approximately 80 cane-sugar producing countries there potential make better use fibrous residue known as bagasse. Subject improved efficiency, sugar producers could supply either “green”, co-generated electricity, or fuel ethanol through cellulose hydrolysis followed by fermentation. This paper compares their projected environmental benefits from a life-cycle perspective, using South African data. Mass and analyses were prepared for two systems base case (producing with current methods), relative annual sugarcane production on one hectare. both cases, burdens avoided replacing equivalent amount fossil included. results obtained confirm that all impact categories considered, “bioenergy” products result benefits. co-generation option lower energy-related emissions (i.e. global warming, acidification eutrophication potentials), whereas preferred terms resource conservation (since it assumed replace oil not coal), also scores human eco-toxicity if lead-bearing oxygenates.

参考文章(15)
John C. Cuzens, James R. Miller, Acid hydrolysis of bagasse for ethanol production Renewable Energy. ,vol. 10, pp. 285- 290 ,(1997) , 10.1016/0960-1481(96)00079-1
Valerie Thomas, Andrew Kwong, None, Ethanol as a lead replacement: phasing out leaded gasoline in Africa Energy Policy. ,vol. 29, pp. 1133- 1143 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00041-6
B. Schlamadinger, M. Apps, F. Bohlin, L. Gustavsson, G. Jungmeier, G. Marland, K. Pingoud, I. Savolainen, Towards a Standard Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems in Comparison with Fossil Energy Systems Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 13, pp. 359- 375 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10032-0
John Sheehan, Andy Aden, Keith Paustian, Kendrick Killian, John Brenner, Marie Walsh, Richard Nelson, Energy and environmental aspects of using corn stover for fuel ethanol. Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 7, pp. 117- 146 ,(2003) , 10.1162/108819803323059433
Romeela Mohee, Revin Panray Beeharry, Life cycle analysis of compost incorporated sugarcane bioenergy systems in Mauritius Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 17, pp. 73- 83 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00026-4
José Goldemberg, Suani Teixeira Coelho, Plinio Mário Nastari, Oswaldo Lucon, Ethanol learning curve—the Brazilian experience Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 26, pp. 301- 304 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00125-9
Lee R. Lynd, Richard T. Elander, Charles E. Wyman, Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. ,vol. 57, pp. 741- 761 ,(1996) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-0223-3_70
Ravi Prakash, Alex Henham, Inder Krishnan Bhat, Net energy and gross pollution from bioethanol production in India Fuel. ,vol. 77, pp. 1629- 1633 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00085-4