Public Perspectives About Pharmacogenetic Testing and Managing Ancillary Findings

作者: Susanne B. Haga , Genevieve Tindall , Julianne M. O'Daniel

DOI: 10.1089/GTMB.2011.0118

关键词: Focus groupDiseaseYoung adultPsychiatryPublic opinionConfidentialityGenetic testingMedicineCoping (psychology)Genetic counseling

摘要: Aims: Pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests are intended to improve therapeutic outcomes through predicting a patient's likelihood respond or experience an adverse effect from specific treatment. In addition, PGx testing may also generate ancillary, incidental, disease information unrelated the purpose for which test was ordered. To assess public attitudes toward testing, ancillary risk and related clinical issues, we conducted series of focus groups. Results: Forty-five individuals recruited Durham, NC, participated in four Overall, participants were enthusiastic about though expressed concerns privacy, confidentiality, psychological harms associated with information. Focus group believed that physicians had responsibility disclose information, but concerned managing coping unexpected Conclusion: We find welcomed integra...

参考文章(23)
Mark A. Rothstein, Carlton A. Hornung, Public Attitudes about Pharmacogenomics Pharmacogenomics. pp. 1- 27 ,(2003) , 10.1002/047142613X.CH1
Allen D. Roses, Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature. ,vol. 405, pp. 857- 865 ,(2000) , 10.1038/35015728
Susanne B Haga, Wylie Burke, Pharmacogenetic testing: not as simple as it seems Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 10, pp. 391- 395 ,(2008) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E31817701D4
S B Haga, J M O'Daniel, G M Tindall, I R Lipkus, R Agans, Survey of US public attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing Pharmacogenomics Journal. ,vol. 12, pp. 197- 204 ,(2012) , 10.1038/TPJ.2011.1
Susanne B. Haga, Julianne M. OʼDaniel, Genevieve M. Tindall, Isaac R. Lipkus, Robert Agans, Public attitudes toward ancillary information revealed by pharmacogenetic testing under limited information conditions. Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 723- 728 ,(2011) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E31821AFCC0
Celeste Condit, Alan Templeton, Benjamin R Bates, Jennifer L Bevan, And Tina M Harris, Attitudinal barriers to delivery of race-targeted pharmacogenomics among informed lay persons. Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 5, pp. 385- 392 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.GIM.0000087990.30961.72
K.M. Sussner, T.A. Edwards, H.S. Thompson, L. Jandorf, N.O. Kwate, A. Forman, K. Brown, N. Kapil-Pair, D.H. Bovbjerg, M.D. Schwartz, H.B. Valdimarsdottir, Ethnic, racial and cultural identity and perceived benefits and barriers related to genetic testing for breast cancer among at-risk women of African descent in New York City. Public Health Genomics. ,vol. 14, pp. 356- 370 ,(2011) , 10.1159/000325263
Susan Persky, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Celeste M Condit, Colleen M McBride, Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 727- 738 ,(2007) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E318159A344
BENJAMIN R. BATES, KRISTAN POIROT, TINA M. HARRIS, CELESTE M. CONDIT, PAUL J. ACHTER, Evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing of race-based pharmacogenomics: a focus group study of public understandings of applied genomic medication. Journal of Health Communication. ,vol. 9, pp. 541- 559 ,(2004) , 10.1080/10810730490882720
Katrina Armstrong, Ellyn Micco, Amy Carney, Jill Stopfer, Mary Putt, Racial Differences in the Use of BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer JAMA. ,vol. 293, pp. 1729- 1736 ,(2005) , 10.1001/JAMA.293.14.1729