Might macronutrient requirements influence grizzly bear–human conflict? Insights from nutritional geometry

作者: Sean C. P. Coogan , David Raubenheimer

DOI: 10.1002/ECS2.1204

关键词: UrsusFood systemsOmnivoreForagingEnergy sourceGrizzly BearsEcologyHuman–wildlife conflictGeographyCarnivore

摘要: Knowledge of carnivore nutritional requirements offers a potentially powerful aid for conservation and management strategies, yet has received little attention. We discuss how ecology, geometry, the concept macronutrient (protein, lipid, carbohydrate) balance can be used to further our understanding behavioral regulatory mechanisms that may influence food-related human–wildlife conflict, focusing on North American grizzly bears (Ursus arctos). propose preferences omnivorous are strong driver their conflict with humans due nutrient-specific foraging behavior, which we predict will particularly noticeable during periods in “key” natural foods high lipid or carbohydrate limiting. demonstrate geometry investigate nutrient by integrating recent research selection bear estimates consumed anthropogenic foods. Our geometric analysis utilizing right-angled mixture triangles suggested offer nonprotein energy sources allow them optimize intake. This macronutrient-focused approach gives rise fundamentally different predictions (and strategies) than conventional food energy-focused approaches. article also provides insight into among other species, human–carnivore more generally, outlining nutritionally explicit predictive framework volatile interface between environments behavior wild animals.

参考文章(77)
K. S. Rajpurohit, P. R. Krausman, Human-sloth-bear conflicts in Madhya Pradesh, India Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 28, pp. 393- 399 ,(2000)
Stephen J. Simpson, David Raubenheimer, The Nature of Nutrition Princeton University Press. ,(2012) , 10.1515/9781400842803
Claudia López-Alfaro, Sean C. P. Coogan, Charles T. Robbins, Jennifer K. Fortin, Scott E. Nielsen, Assessing Nutritional Parameters of Brown Bear Diets among Ecosystems Gives Insight into Differences among Populations. PLOS ONE. ,vol. 10, ,(2015) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0128088
J. M. Northrup, G. B. Stenhouse, M. S. Boyce, Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears Animal Conservation. ,vol. 15, pp. 369- 377 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2012.00525.X
Gilad Bino, Amit Dolev, Dotan Yosha, Amichay Guter, Roni King, David Saltz, Salit Kark, Abrupt spatial and numerical responses of overabundant foxes to a reduction in anthropogenic resources Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 47, pp. 1262- 1271 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2010.01882.X
Özgün Emre Can, Neil D'Cruze, David L. Garshelis, John Beecham, David W. Macdonald, Resolving Human‐Bear Conflict: A Global Survey of Countries, Experts, and Key Factors Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 501- 513 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12117
O. Lynne Nelson, Heiko T. Jansen, Elizabeth Galbreath, Kurt Morgenstern, Jamie Lauren Gehring, Kimberly Scott Rigano, Jae Lee, Jianhua Gong, Adam J. Shaywitz, Chantal A. Vella, Charles T. Robbins, Kevin C. Corbit, Grizzly bears exhibit augmented insulin sensitivity while obese prior to a reversible insulin resistance during hibernation. Cell Metabolism. ,vol. 20, pp. 376- 382 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CMET.2014.07.008
Kevin D. Kohl, Sean C. P. Coogan, David Raubenheimer, Do wild carnivores forage for prey or for nutrients? BioEssays. ,vol. 37, pp. 701- 709 ,(2015) , 10.1002/BIES.201400171
R. C. Brooks, S. J. Simpson, D. Raubenheimer, The price of protein: combining evolutionary and economic analysis to understand excessive energy consumption. Obesity Reviews. ,vol. 11, pp. 887- 894 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2010.00733.X