Politics and institutions: European parliamentary technology assessment

作者: Laura Cruz-Castro , Luis Sanz-Menéndez

DOI: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2004.01.007

关键词: SociologyCompetition (economics)Technology assessmentPoliticsPublic administrationAutonomyIncentiveLegislatureDiversity (politics)Context (language use)

摘要: Abstract This paper analyses, from an institutionalist perspective, the emergence, nature and ways in which parliamentary scientific technological advice activities are carried out different European countries. A diffusion process United Sates could be identified early times, but some local preconditions also important for adoption of these practices Europe, as well existence political entrepreneurs willing to advance initiatives within their respective systems. We argue that connection technology assessment (TA) with can only understood if former is regarded not input decision-making a legitimising mechanism. Different models arrangements TA (PTA) identified, depending on degree inclusiveness actors process. The adaptation, consolidation differential impact organizations mediated by two factors: capacity PTA gain support, both inside outside Legislature, access decision makers environment competition other produce TA. Models have types capacities differing degrees. It argued differences potential countries analysed context rules game incentives face. autonomy/dependence exclusivity/nonexclusivity parliaments essential understanding diversity impacts.

参考文章(32)
Leonhard Hennen, Sergio Bellucci, Robby Berloznik, David Cope, Laura Cruz-Castro, Theodoros Karapiperis, Miltos Ladikas, Lars Klüver, Sanz-Menéndez, Jan Staman, Susanne Stephan, Tomasz Szapiro, Towards a Framework for Assessing the Impact of Technology Assessment Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. pp. 57- 85 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-3-662-06171-8_3
Laura Cruz-Castro, Luis Sanz-Menéndez, Shaping the Impact: the Institutional Context of Technology Assessment Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. pp. 101- 127 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-3-662-06171-8_5
M Granger Morgan, Jon M Peha, None, Science and Technology Advice for Congress ,(2003)
Megan Jones, David H Guston, Lewis M Branscomb, Informed Legislatures: Coping with Science in a Democracy ,(1996)
Norman J Vig, Herbert Paschen, None, Parliaments and technology : the development of technology assessment in Europe State University of New York Press. ,(2000)
Josée C.M. Van Eijndhoven, Technology assessment: Product or process? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 54, pp. 269- 286 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00210-7
Bruce Bimber, David H. Guston, Introduction: The end of OTA and the future of technology assessment Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 54, pp. 125- 130 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0040-1625(97)81491-6
David Whiteman, Congress and policy analysis Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ,vol. 54, pp. 177- 189 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00184-9