Meta-analysis of attitudes toward damage-causing mammalian wildlife.

作者: RUTH KANSKY , MARTIN KIDD , ANDREW T. KNIGHT

DOI: 10.1111/COBI.12275

关键词: HumanitiesBiodiversity conservation

摘要: Many populations of threatened mammals persist outside formally protected areas, and their survival depends on the willingness communities to coexist with them. An understanding attitudes, specifically tolerance, individuals factors that determine these is therefore fundamental designing strategies alleviate human-wildlife conflict. We conducted a meta-analysis identify affected attitudes toward 4 groups terrestrial mammals. Elephants (65%) elicited most positive followed by primates (55%), ungulates (53%), carnivores (44%). Urban residents presented (80%), commercial farmers (51%) communal (26%). A tolerance damage index showed human was proportional probability experiencing while elephants levels higher than anticipated lower anticipated. Contrary conventional wisdom, not always dominant factor determining attitudes. Communal had being irrespective damage, urban were more likely be damage. ungulates, elephants, when low, but it high. Commercial primates, Taxonomic bias may important. Identifying distinct explaining specific contexts in which they operate, inclusive species causing will essential for prioritizing conservation investments. Meta-Analisis de las Posturas hacia la Mamiferos Silvestres Causantes Danos Resumen Muchas poblaciones mamiferos amenazados persisten fuera areas protegidas formales y su supervivencia depende buena voluntad comunidades que coexisten con ellos. Un entendimiento posturas, especificamente tolerancia, los individuos factores determinan es para disenar estrategias alivien el conflicto humano – vida silvestre. Llevamos cabo un meta-analisis identificar afectaron posturas cuatro grupos terrestres. Los elefantes provocaron mas positivas. siguieron ungulados (53%) carnivoros residentes urbanos presentaron positivas seguidos por granjeros comerciales comunales indice tolerancia danos mostro humana fue proporcional probabilidad experimentar mientras niveles altos lo esperado bajos esperado. Contrario sabiduria convencional, no siempre dominante determinar posturas. tuvieron una baja ser positivos independientemente danos, mayor danos. ungulados, cuando baja, pero alta. El prejuicio taxonomico eso puede importante. distintos explican estas contextos especificos en cuales operan, inclusivo especies causan sera esencial priorizar inversiones conservacion.

参考文章(63)
William F Siemer, John F Organ, Daniel J. Decker, Shawn J. Riley, Len H. Carpenter, Gary Parsons, George F Mattfeld, The essence of wildlife management Wildlife Society Bulletin. ,vol. 30, pp. 585- 593 ,(2016)
Charlie M. Shackleton, Sheona Shackleton, The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa South African Journal of Science. ,vol. 100, pp. 658- 664 ,(2004)
Jacqueline Saunders, Izabella Koziell, Living off biodiversity: exploring livelihoods and biodiversity issues in natural resources management. Living off biodiversity: exploring livelihoods and biodiversity issues in natural resources management.. ,(2001)
M. C. Calver, M. C. Calver, D. R. King, D. R. King, Why publication matters in conservation biology Pacific Conservation Biology. ,vol. 6, pp. 2- 8 ,(2000) , 10.1071/PC000002
Peter Jackson, Sarah Christie, John Seidensticker, Riding the tiger : tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes Cambridge University Press. ,(1999)
Hans Kruuk, Diana E. Brown, Hunter and hunted : relationships between carnivores and people Cambridge University Press. ,(2002) , 10.1017/CBO9780511614996
Michael J Manfredo, Human dimensions of wildlife management Johns Hopkins University Press. ,(2012)
Kimberley Christine Patton, Paul Waldau, A communion of subjects : animals in religion, science, and ethics Columbia University Press. ,(2006)
Peter Jackson, Kristin Nowell, Wild cats status survey and conservation action plan IUCN. ,(1996)