Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using 5% benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin versus 2.5% benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin topical treatments in acne.

作者： Elizabeth M. Seidler , Alexa B. Kimball

DOI: 10.1016/J.JAAD.2011.03.014

关键词: Clindamycin 、 Randomized controlled trial 、 Dermatologic agents 、 Acne 、 Dermatology 、 Medicine 、 Benzoyl peroxide 、 Meta-analysis

摘要:

jaad.org 本地加速

sciencedirect.com 本地加速

nih.gov 本地加速

elsevier.com 本地加速

sci-hub.se PDF 下载加速

参考文章(3)

Juian-Juian Jan Fu, J Mark Jackson, Jennifer L Almekinder, A randomized, investigator-blinded trial to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of a benzoyl peroxide 5%/ clindamycin phosphate 1% gel compared with a clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/tretinoin 0.025% gel in the topical treatment of acne vulgaris. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. ,vol. 9, pp. 131- 136 ,(2010)

Yentzer Ba, Kinney Ma, Fleischer Ab, Feldman, Trends in the treatment of acne vulgaris: are measures being taken to avoid antimicrobial resistance? Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. ,vol. 9, pp. 519- ,(2010)

Elizabeth M. Seidler, Alexa B. Kimball, Meta-analysis comparing efficacy of benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, benzoyl peroxide with salicylic acid, and combination benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin in acne Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 63, pp. 52- 62 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.JAAD.2009.07.052