Central nervous system effects of meclizine and dimenhydrinate: evidence of acute tolerance to antihistamines.

作者: C. Manning , L. Scandale , E. J. Manning , F. M. Gengo

DOI: 10.1002/J.1552-4604.1992.TB03801.X

关键词: SomnolenceAnesthesiaDimenhydrinateRandomized controlled trialHistamine H1 receptorPlaceboCrossover studyDrug toleranceMedicineVisual analogue scale

摘要: Relative daytime drowsiness and performance impairment produced by meclizine dimenhydrinate was assessed in 24 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received either dimenhydrinate, 100 mg, at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 4:00 PM; meclizine, 50 with placebo PM or all three times this randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study. Impairment of mental choice reaction time testing digit symbol substitution scores. Drowsiness self-assessed on the Stanford Sleepiness Scale a visual analog scale. Both antihistamines changes substitution, recognition time, subjective assessments sleepiness different from placebo. Expressed as change baseline, greatest reductions scores after occurred 3 hours first dose (6.6 +/- 7) were not measured (5.8 8), which 9 administered. Similar results obtained other psychometric test Self-rated 1 hour dose, significantly greater than largest degree 7 dose. The effects compared magnitude subsequent doses. effect data suggest possibility that acute tolerance to central nervous system develops multiple doses dimenhydrinate.

参考文章(12)
M. D. Wood, C. D. Wood, W. A. Vekovius, J. E. Manno, B. R. Manno, H. M. Redetzki, Side effects of antimotion sickness drugs Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. ,vol. 55, pp. 113- 116 ,(1984)
Liselotte Moser, K. J. H�ther, J. Koch-Weser, P. V. Lundt, Effects of terfenadine and diphenhydramine alone or in combination with diazepam or alcohol on psychomotor performance and subjective feelings. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 14, pp. 417- 423 ,(1978) , 10.1007/BF00716383
S. H. Snyder, J. J. Katims, Z. Annau, R. F. Bruns, J. W. Daly, Adenosine receptors and behavioral actions of methylxanthines Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 78, pp. 3260- 3264 ,(1981) , 10.1073/PNAS.78.5.3260
C. E. Bye, R. Claridge, A. W. Peck, F. Plowman, Evidence for tolerance to the central nervous effects of the histamine antagonist, triprolidine, in man. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 12, pp. 181- 186 ,(1977) , 10.1007/BF00609857
Graham Starmer, Antihistamines and highway safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 17, pp. 311- 317 ,(1985) , 10.1016/0001-4575(85)90032-6
D GOETZ, J JACOBSON, J MURNANE, M REID, D REPPERGER, C GOODYEAR, M MARTIN, Prolongation of simple and choice reaction times in a double-blind comparison of twice-daily hydroxyzine versus terfenadine. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. ,vol. 84, pp. 316- 322 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90414-4
F. M. Gengo, C. Gabos, C. Straley, C. Manning, The Pharmacodynamics of Ethanol: Effects on Performance and Judgment The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 30, pp. 748- 754 ,(1990) , 10.1002/J.1552-4604.1990.TB03638.X