Ductal carcinoma in situ detected in the mammographic era: an analysis of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome with breast-conserving therapy.

作者: Frank A. Vicini , Mario D. Lacerna , Neal S. Goldstein , Eric M. Horwitz , Carl F. Dmuchowski

DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00314-3

关键词: Ductal carcinomaMastectomyBiopsyRadiation therapyCarcinomaSurgical marginPopulationLumpectomySurgeryMedicine

摘要: Purpose: We reviewed our institution's experience treating predominantly mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to determine if any clinical, pathologic, or treatment-related factors affected outcome. Methods and Materials: From January 2, 1980 6, 1992, 107 breasts 105 patients were treated BCT at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI. All underwent least an excisional biopsy 70 (65%) reexcised. received whole-breast irradiation a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range 43.1 56.0 Gy). Ninety-nine (93%) supplemental boost the tumor bed for total 60.4 59.1 71.8 Gy) using either photons (2 patients), electrons (69 interstitial implant (28 patients). Results: With follow-up 78 months, 10 have failed breast 5- 10-year actuarial local control rate 91.2 89.8%, respectively. Thirteen percent population been followed years more. Three recurrences pure DCIS, seven invasive. salvaged mastectomy. Nine remain without evidence disease 30.6 months after surgery. One patient distantly 36 recurrence ultimate cause specific survival 99%. Potential clinical (age, mammographic findings, method detection, etc.), pathologic (nuclear grade, margins, (dose, technique, reexcision status, etc.) affecting outcome analyzed. No variable was found be associated ipsilateral recurrence. However, when only that occurred within immediately adjacent lumpectomy cavity analyzed, both margin status extent cancerization lobules (COL) near surgical development Conclusions: Patients DCIS achieve excellent rates overall survival. Both COL appear cavity. These data suggest careful attention completeness resection is important determinant

参考文章(40)
Michael D. Lagios, Duct Carcinoma in Situ: Pathology and Treatment Surgical Clinics of North America. ,vol. 70, pp. 853- 871 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)45185-6
Thomas J. Anderson, David L. Page, Diagnostic Histopathology of the Breast ,(1988)
David R. Cox, Regression Models and Life-Tables Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 34, pp. 527- 541 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37
Oliver Howard Beahrs, Max H. Myers, Manual for Staging of Cancer ,(1992)
L J Solin, J Kurtz, A Fourquet, R Amalric, A Recht, B A Bornstein, R Kuske, M Taylor, W Barrett, B Fowble, B Haffty, D J Schultz, I T Yeh, B McCormick, M McNeese, Fifteen-year results of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 14, pp. 754- 763 ,(1996) , 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.754
P Price, HD Sinnett, B Gusterson, G Walsh, RP A'Hern, JA McKinna, Duct carcinoma in situ: predictors of local recurrence and progression in patients treated by surgery alone. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 61, pp. 869- 872 ,(1990) , 10.1038/BJC.1990.194
FRANK A. VICINI, TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN, JAMES L. CONNOLLY, ABRAM RECHT, ANTHONY ABNER, STUART J. SCHNITT, WILLIAM SILEN, JAY R. HARRIS, The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 214, pp. 200- 205 ,(1991) , 10.1097/00000658-199109000-00002
Melvin J. Silverstein, Bernard F. Cohlan, Eugene D. Gierson, Martin Furmanski, Parvis Gamagami, William J. Colburn, Bernard S. Lewinsky, James R. Waisman, Duct carcinoma in situ: 227 cases without microinvasion European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 28, pp. 630- 634 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0959-8049(05)80114-5