Membrane cut-off does not influence results regarding the measurement of small molecules - a comparative study between 20- and 100-kDa catheters in hepatic microdialysis.

作者: Melroy A D'souza , Anna Ravn , Carl Jorns , Greg Nowak , Bengt Isaksson

DOI: 10.1111/CPF.12071

关键词:

摘要: Summary Background Microdialysis is a method used to monitor hepatic tissue metabolism. Membranes with molecular cut-off of 20 kilodalton (kDa) are currently measure the small metabolites glucose, glycerol, lactate and pyruvate. Using membranes higher such as 100 kDa allows possibility measuring larger molecules but may affect results regarding molecules. The aim was compare microdialysis catheters 20 in measurement pig liver model. Methods Four were inserted into each experiment (n = 6). Two 20 kDa perfused Ringer acetate, two 100 kDa: one acetate hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) at flow rate 0·3 μl min−1. Dialysate samples collected 40-min intervals analysed for pyruvate. Results Compared other catheters, 100-kDa tended dialysate concentrations molecules, difference reaching statistical significance case Concentrations measured by Voluven were, however, comparable 20-kDa catheters. Conclusions Microdialysis membrane can be equally monitoring pyruvate, lactate/pyruvate ratio if high osmotic solution perfuse catheters.

参考文章(21)
Janne Jyr??nki, Sinikka Suominen, Jyrki Vuola, Leif B??ck, Microdialysis in clinical practice: monitoring intraoral free flaps. Annals of Plastic Surgery. ,vol. 56, pp. 387- 393 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.SAP.0000205231.39853.87
Lars Wælgaard, Ebbe Billmann Thorgersen, Pål-Dag Line, Aksel Foss, Tom Eirik Mollnes, Tor Inge Tønnessen, Microdialysis monitoring of liver grafts by metabolic parameters, cytokine production, and complement activation. Transplantation. ,vol. 86, pp. 1096- 1103 ,(2008) , 10.1097/TP.0B013E31818775CA
Patricia A. Sheiner, C. V.R. Rathna Varma, James V. Guarrera, James Cooper, Marco Garatti, Sukru Emre, Stephen R. Guy, Myron E. Schwartz, Charles M. Miller, Selective revascularization of hepatic artery thromboses after liver transplantation improves patient and graft survival. Transplantation. ,vol. 64, pp. 1295- 1299 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00007890-199711150-00011
Xiaoping Ao, Robert F. Rotundo, Daniel J. Loegering, Julie A. Stenken, In vivo microdialysis sampling of cytokines produced in mice given bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Microbiological Methods. ,vol. 62, pp. 327- 336 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.MIMET.2005.04.016
H Rosdahl, U Ungerstedt, L Jorfeldt, J Henriksson, Interstitial glucose and lactate balance in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue studied by microdialysis. The Journal of Physiology. ,vol. 471, pp. 637- 657 ,(1993) , 10.1113/JPHYSIOL.1993.SP019920
R. Lorho, B. Turlin, N. Aqodad, N. Triki, A.S. de Lajarte-Thirouard, C. Camus, M. Lakehal, P. Compagnon, E. Dupont-Bierre, B. Meunier, K. Boudjema, M. Messner, C4d: a marker for hepatic transplant rejection. Annual Conference of the French-Speaking Society of Transplantation. ,vol. 38, pp. 2333- 2334 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.TRANSPROCEED.2006.06.120
G. Nowak, J. Ungerstedt, J. Wernerman, U. Ungerstedt, B.-G. Ericzon, Clinical experience in continuous graft monitoring with microdialysis early after liver transplantation. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 89, pp. 1169- 1175 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1365-2168.2002.02187.X
J Clay Goodman, Claudia S Robertson, Microdialysis: is it ready for prime time? Current Opinion in Critical Care. ,vol. 15, pp. 110- 117 ,(2009) , 10.1097/MCC.0B013E328325D142