作者: Roope Sarvilinna , Heini Huhtala , Roope Sovelius , Pekka Halonen , Juha Nevalainen
DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708030
关键词:
摘要: We compared retrospectively 31 patients with a periprosthetic fracture to in control group. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register was used count all fractures treated by revision arthroplasty Finland and Tampere University Hospital district during the years 1990-1999. date of previous operation find group operated on at same time hospital district. No other selection or matching criteria were used. type prosthesis, complications, age, BMI, cementation primary diagnosis compared. found that who had as ran 4.4 (95%CI = 1.4-14) times higher risk than those for reasons.