Palaeontology and Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Science of the Nineteenth and Twenty–first Centuries

作者: Brian K. Hall

DOI: 10.1111/1475-4983.00253

关键词:

摘要: A wind of change has swept through palaeontology in the past few decades. Contrast Sir Peter Medawar’s dismissive: ‘palaeontology is a particularly undemanding branch science’ (as recalled by John Maynard Smith Sabbagh 1999, p. 158) with ‘Palaeontology: grasping opportunities science twenty–first century’, title contribution to special issue Geobios Cambridge palaeontologist, Simon Conway Morris (1998a). The winds have come partly from palaeontologists seeking broaden impact their studies and biologists (neontologists) realizing contributions that can make disciplines. Consequently, impressions life preserved stone are coming alive. Fossils being described analyzed using new tools languages as static fossil record becomes transitions patterns be explained related biological, ecological, climatic tectonic changes. latest addition evolutionary developmental biology, or ‘evo–devo’, whose language provides basis upon which interpret anatomical change, both materially mechanistically. In this review I examine major made palaeontology, how been linked evolution embryology past, links evo–devo enlivened will continue enliven evo–devo. Closer between two fields should illuminate important unresolved issues origin metazoans (e.g. Why there conflict molecular clocks timing metazoan radiation; were Precambrian ancestors similar extant larvae miniature adults?) diversification How do constraints bias direction evolution; microevolutionary processes relate macroevolutionary changes?).

参考文章(152)
SUSAN W. HERRING, Introduction: How to Do Functional Morphology Integrative and Comparative Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 189- 192 ,(1988) , 10.1093/ICB/28.1.189
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 205, pp. 581- 598 ,(1979) , 10.1098/RSPB.1979.0086
L. Wray, G., Levinton, J.S., Shapiro, Molecular Evidence for Deep Precambrian Divergences Among Metazoan Phyla Science. ,vol. 274, pp. 568- 573 ,(1996) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.274.5287.568
CAROLE S. HICKMAN, Analysis of Form and Function in Fossils Integrative and Comparative Biology. ,vol. 28, pp. 775- 793 ,(1988) , 10.1093/ICB/28.2.775
Luis M Chiappe, Leonardo Salgado, Rodolfo A Coria, Embryonic Skulls of Titanosaur Sauropod Dinosaurs Science. ,vol. 293, pp. 2444- 2446 ,(2001) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1063723
A. G. Collins, Evaluating multiple alternative hypotheses for the origin of Bilateria: an analysis of 18S rRNA molecular evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 95, pp. 15458- 15463 ,(1998) , 10.1073/PNAS.95.26.15458
Michael E Hellberg, Deborah P Balch, Kaustuv Roy, Climate-Driven Range Expansion and Morphological Evolution in a Marine Gastropod Science. ,vol. 292, pp. 1707- 1710 ,(2001) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1060102
Misia Landau, Narratives of human evolution ,(1991)
Lois N. Magner, Philip F. Rehbock, The Philosophical Naturalists: Themes in Early Nineteenth-Century British Biology The American Historical Review. ,vol. 89, pp. 1072- ,(1984) , 10.2307/1866448