Measuring the clinical response. What does it mean

作者: P Therasse

DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00182-X

关键词:

摘要: The clinical response to treatment is an important indicator of the therapeutic effect anticancer agents. Its value and interpretation has be carefully considered within context that it used. In daily practice, assessment combined with other indicators patient's condition contribute decision-making process. trials, widely used identify quantify anti-tumour activity new this context, evaluation conducted on basis strict predefined criteria such as World Health Organization (WHO) or Response Evaluation Criteria Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. RECIST have recently been proposed offer a detailed guidance perform evaluation. Clinical also efficacy in combination indicators. surrogate survival benefit remains unclear most instances can hardly established framework single randomised trial. With development agents behave differently cytotoxics, will integrate concepts disease stabilisation time progression. Over next decade, oncologists able assess biological before response, lot work energy dedicated predictive and, possibly, prognostic regard well more definitive measures benefit.

参考文章(26)
P Thiesse, L Ollivier, D Di Stefano-Louineau, S Négrier, J Savary, K Pignard, C Lasset, B Escudier, Response rate accuracy in oncology trials: reasons for interobserver variability. Groupe Français d'Immunothérapie of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 15, pp. 3507- 3514 ,(1997) , 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.12.3507
Bruce D. Cheson, Sandra J. Horning, Bertr Coiffier, Margaret A. Shipp, Richard I. Fisher, Joseph M. Connors, T. Andrew Lister, Julie Vose, Antonio Grillo-López, Anton Hagenbeek, Fernando Cabanillas, Donald Klippensten, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Ronald Castellino, Nancy L. Harris, James O. Armitage, William Carter, Richard Hoppe, George P. Canellos, Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 17, pp. 1244- 1244 ,(1999) , 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1244
L Gianni, E Munzone, G Capri, F Fulfaro, E Tarenzi, F Villani, C Spreafico, A Laffranchi, A Caraceni, C Martini, Paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 13, pp. 2688- 2699 ,(1995) , 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.11.2688
A Kramar, D Potvin, C Hill, Multistage designs for phase II clinical trials: statistical issues in cancer research. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 74, pp. 1317- 1320 ,(1996) , 10.1038/BJC.1996.537
Stephanie Green, Geoffrey R. Weiss, Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteria. Investigational New Drugs. ,vol. 10, pp. 239- 253 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00944177
Charles G. Zubrod, Marvin Schneiderman, Emil Frei, Clyde Brindley, G. Lennard Gold, Bruce Shnider, Raul Oviedo, John Gorman, Ralph Jones, Ulfar Jonsson, Jack Colsky, Thomas Chalmers, Bruce Ferguson, Margarida Dederick, James Holland, Oleg Selawry, William Regelson, Louis Lasagna, Albert H. Owens, Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide Journal of Chronic Diseases. ,vol. 11, pp. 7- 33 ,(1960) , 10.1016/0021-9681(60)90137-5
Valter Torri, Richard Simon, Estelle Russek-Cohen, Douglas Midthune, Michael Friedman, Statistical Model to Determine the Relationship of Response and Survival in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 84, pp. 407- 413 ,(1992) , 10.1093/JNCI/84.6.407
RP A'Hern, SR Ebbs, MB Baum, Does chemotherapy improve survival in advanced breast cancer? A statistical overview. British Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 57, pp. 615- 618 ,(1988) , 10.1038/BJC.1988.140