Role of Imaging in Drug Development

作者: Mihailo Lalich , Teresa M. McShane , Glenn Liu

DOI: 10.1016/B978-012374212-4.50083-3

关键词:

摘要: Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on the emerging role of novel radiographic imaging in drug development process. The main purpose is to provide an overview how can facilitate development. Every step undertaken view regulatory requirements that will eventually need be satisfied for FDA approval. requires shows acceptable safety profile and adequate clinical benefit a defined patient population. shift toward less toxic, predominantly cytostatic agents renders traditional system inadequate. inadequacy seen throughout entire Limited resources are additional barrier current Use during diagnosis staging common familiar all clinicians. Depending tumor type location, anatomic using CT, MRI, or bone scintigraphy standard most cases delineating size extent malignancy. routine use these modalities more qualitative than quantitative due subjectivity interpretation among radiologists 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET universally available molecular technology approved by Centers Medicare Medicaid Services cancers non-small cell lung, breast, esophageal, colorectal, head neck, cervix, melanoma lymphoma, as well monitoring response treatment breast cancer. It has been invaluable tool planning other cancers.

参考文章(33)
Richard M.J. Bohmer, Clayton M. Christensen, John Kenagy, Will disruptive innovations cure health care Harvard Business Review. ,vol. 78, pp. 102- 199 ,(2000)
Bruce A. Chabner, Thomas G. Roberts, Chemotherapy and the war on cancer Nature Reviews Cancer. ,vol. 5, pp. 65- 72 ,(2005) , 10.1038/NRC1529
Sibylle I. Ziegler, Markus Schwaiger, Axel-R. Hanauske, Wolfgang A. Weber, Ralf Thödtmann, Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. ,vol. 40, pp. 1771- 1777 ,(1999)
Christopher D.M. Fletcher, Heikki Joensuu, George D. Demetri, Margaret von Mehren, Charles D. Blanke, Annick D. Van den Abbeele, Burton Eisenberg, Peter J. Roberts, Michael C. Heinrich, David A. Tuveson, Samuel Singer, Milos Janicek, Jonathan A. Fletcher, Stuart G. Silverman, Sandra L. Silberman, Renaud Capdeville, Beate Kiese, Bin Peng, Sasa Dimitrijevic, Brian J. Druker, Christopher Corless, Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 347, pp. 472- 480 ,(2002) , 10.1056/NEJMOA020461
Helen L. Anderson, Jeffrey T. Yap, Mathew P. Miller, Adele Robbins, Terry Jones, Patricia M. Price, Assessment of Pharmacodynamic Vascular Response in a Phase I Trial of Combretastatin A4 Phosphate Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 2823- 2830 ,(2003) , 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.186
Susan M. Galbraith, Ross J. Maxwell, Martin A. Lodge, Gillian M. Tozer, John Wilson, N. Jane Taylor, J. James Stirling, Luiza Sena, Anwar R. Padhani, Gordon J.S. Rustin, Combretastatin A4 Phosphate Has Tumor Antivascular Activity in Rat and Man as Demonstrated by Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 2831- 2842 ,(2003) , 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.187
Lee M. Ellis, Antiangiogenic therapy: more promise and, yet again, more questions. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 3897- 3899 ,(2003) , 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.977
Mohammad I. Zia, Lillian L. Siu, Greg R. Pond, Eric X. Chen, Comparison of Outcomes of Phase II Studies and Subsequent Randomized Control Studies Using Identical Chemotherapeutic Regimens Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 23, pp. 6982- 6991 ,(2005) , 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.679
Deborah Schrag, The price tag on progress--chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 351, pp. 317- 319 ,(2004) , 10.1056/NEJMP048143
P Therasse, Measuring the clinical response. What does it mean European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 38, pp. 1817- 1823 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00182-X