Harvested wood products and REDD+: looking beyond the forest border

作者: Tunggul Butarbutar , Michael Köhl , Prem Raj Neupane

DOI: 10.1186/S13021-016-0046-9

关键词:

摘要: The focus of REDD+ is sensu stricto on maintaining forest carbon stocks. We extend the scope sustainable management from forests to timber utilization, and study offsets resulting utilization harvested for bio energy or wood products (HWPs). emission budget harvesting operations depends loss standing biomass by extracted site logging losses one side, other end use processing residues. develop two scenarios quantify magnitude CO2 emissions (1) energetic (2) material compare substitution effects different fossil sources. direct does not compensate stock. Logging residuals displacement factors reflecting constitute far most important factor in potential reductions. Substitution mill HWPs have only a subordinated contribution total as well type fuel utilized effects. Material associated with show high increase climate change benefits. observation perception should be restricted reduced impact practices domain but extended timber. result considerable reductions, which can carbon, eventually contribute overall mitigation benefits forestry sector.

参考文章(40)
M. Scharai-Rad, J. Welling, Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes. Environmental and energy balances of wood products and substitutes.. ,(2002)
Francis X Johnson, None, What woodfuels can do to mitigate climate change Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. ,(2010)
M. Herold, V. de Sy, G.M. Kissinger, Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers The Government of the UK and Norway,. ,(2012)
H. Lamprecht, Silviculture in the tropics. Tropical forest ecosystems and their tree species: possibilities and methods to ensure sustained productivity. Silviculture in the tropics. Tropical forest ecosystems and their tree species: possibilities and methods to ensure sustained productivity.. ,(1986)
Michael Köhl, Rodel Lasco, Miguel Cifuentes, Örjan Jonsson, Kari T. Korhonen, Philip Mundhenk, Jose de Jesus Navar, Graham Stinson, Changes in forest production, biomass and carbon: Results from the 2015 UN FAO Global Forest Resource Assessment Forest Ecology and Management. ,vol. 352, pp. 21- 34 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FORECO.2015.05.036
M.J.W. Jansen, Review of Saltelli, A. & Chan, K. & E.M.Scott (Eds) (2000), Sensitivity analysis. Wiley (2000) Kwantitatieve methoden : nieuwsbrief voor toegepaste statistiek en operationele research. ,vol. 67, pp. 112- 113 ,(2001)
Hannah E. Daly, Kate Scott, Neil Strachan, John Barrett, Indirect CO2 Emission Implications of Energy System Pathways: Linking IO and TIMES Models for the UK Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 49, pp. 10701- 10709 ,(2015) , 10.1021/ACS.EST.5B01020
G. Marland, B. Schlamadinger, Forests for Carbon Sequestration or Fossil Fuel Substitution? A Sensitivity Analysis Biomass & Bioenergy. ,vol. 13, pp. 389- 397 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00027-5