Critical appraisal of treatment techniques based on conventional photon beams, intensity modulated photon beams and proton beams for therapy of intact breast.

作者: Antonella Fogliata , Alessandra Bolsi , Luca Cozzi

DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00476-5

关键词:

摘要: Purpose: To analyse different treatment techniques with conventional photon beams, intensity modulated and proton beams for intact breast irradiation patients in whom would cause potentially dangerous lung irradiation. Material methods: Five cancer highly concave tissue volume around the were considered at planning level order to assess suitability of techniques. Three-dimensional dose distributions two-field tangential treatment, radiotherapy (IMRT), three-field non-IMRT, IMRT, single-field investigated, aiming assessing possibility reduce below risk levels. Analysis dose‐volume histograms related physical biological parameters (significant minimum, maximum mean doses, conformity indexes equivalent uniform (EUD)) planned target (PTV) was carried out. Dose plans compared technique. Results: PTV coverage comparable non-IMRT IMRT (EUD from 47.1 49.4 Gy), improved ¼ 49:8 Gy). Lung reduced, terms dose, (9.5 Gy) technique (3.5 respect (12.9 Gy); also a reduction irradiated high doses observed. Better results could be achieved protons. In addition, cardiac reduced those Conclusions: Geometrically difficult thus reducing which is proposed as standard this category patients. Intensity only marginally more successful than corresponding treatments, while protons offer excellent results. q 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

参考文章(37)
Gábor Gyenes, Lars Erik Rutqvist, Anette Liedberg, Tommy Fornander, Long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality in a randomized trial of pre- and postoperative radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer Radiotherapy and Oncology. ,vol. 48, pp. 185- 190 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0167-8140(98)00062-0
Sha X. Chang, Katharin M. Deschesne, Timothy J. Cullip, Stephanie A. Parker, Jon Earnhart, A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 45, pp. 1305- 1314 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00344-2
Björn Zackrisson, Mikael Arevärn, Mikael Karlsson, Optimized MLC-beam arrangements for tangential breast irradiation. Radiotherapy and Oncology. ,vol. 54, pp. 209- 212 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00143-2
Anders Gustafsson, Bengt K. Lind, Roger Svensson, Anders Brahme, Simultaneous optimization of dynamic multileaf collimation and scanning patterns or compensation filters using a generalized pencil beam algorithm. Medical Physics. ,vol. 22, pp. 1141- 1156 ,(1995) , 10.1118/1.597507
Stefan L.S. Kwa, Joos V. Lebesque, Jacqueline C.M. Theuws, Lawrence B. Marks, Mike T. Munley, Gunilla Bentel, Dieter Oetzel, Uwe Spahn, Mary V. Graham, Robert E. Drzymala, James A. Purdy, Allen S. Lichter, Mary K. Martel, Randall K. Ten Haken, Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: An analysis of pooled data of 540 patients International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 42, pp. 1- 9 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00196-5
Edward Baral, Lars-Eric Larsson, Britta Mattsson, Breast cancer following irradiation of the breast. Cancer. ,vol. 40, pp. 2905- 2910 ,(1977) , 10.1002/1097-0142(197712)40:6<2905::AID-CNCR2820400621>3.0.CO;2-Y
Cancer in the contralateral breast after radiotherapy for breast cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 327, pp. 781- 785 ,(1992) , 10.1056/NEJM199208063270614
Andrzej Niemierko, Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: A concept of equivalent uniform dose Medical Physics. ,vol. 24, pp. 103- 110 ,(1997) , 10.1118/1.598063
Carl M. Mansfield, Lydia T. Komarnicky, Gordon F. Schwartz, Anne L. Rosenberg, Leela Krishnan, William R. Jewell, Francis E. Rosato, Melvin L. Moses, Mahroo Haghbin, Janet Taylor, Ten-year results in 1070 patients with stages I and II breast cancer treated by conservative surgery and radiation therapy Cancer. ,vol. 75, pp. 2328- 2336 ,(1995) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2328::AID-CNCR2820750923>3.0.CO;2-L