Mutual Benefits: Linking Science and Policy in the Delta

作者: Judy Meyer ,

DOI: 10.15447/SFEWS.2013V11ISS3ART4

关键词:

摘要: October 2013 San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science: Science Policy for the Delta Mutual Benefits: Linking and in Judy L. Meyer Odum School of Ecology University Georgia Athens, GA 30602 USA jlmeyer@uga.edu Member, Independent Board Introduction Scientists decision-makers Bay–Delta are not unique. Ecosystem management programs worldwide exploring ways to better link science policy as a means enhance restore services that ecosystems provide society. Improving effectiveness this requires policy-relevant scientific research, effective communication research findings, an efficient altering when desired outcomes achieved or relevant understanding changes. Enhancing Policy-relevant Scientific Research will clear solutions, but it can be useful establishing boundary conditions within which decision reached. Fostering dynamic leaders both arenas interactions build trust among them. To effective, needs address questions, meet standards rigor, unbiased politically (Clark et al. 2002 Van Cleve 2004). This scien- tists who independent informed about issues managers policy- makers face recognize increased result from inspired by questions. Yet shouldn’t driven only current Long-term anticipatory is essential develop knowledge base needed future decisions. These goals facilitated respectful interaction between researchers policymakers whose decisions information gathered. An structure acknowledges disagreements scientists inevitable (e.g., differing interpretations data competing restoration proposals) provides mechanisms resolving these disagreements. Means resolution include assessment process work- shops aimed at achieving consensus-based exist-

参考文章(8)
Peter M Groffman, Cathlyn Stylinski, Matthew C Nisbet, Carlos M Duarte, Rebecca Jordan, Amy Burgin, M Andrea Previtali, James Coloso, Restarting the conversation: Challenges at the interface between ecology and society Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 8, pp. 284- 291 ,(2010) , 10.1890/090160
Judy L Meyer, Peter C Frumhoff, Steven P Hamburg, Carlos de la Rosa, Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 8, pp. 299- 305 ,(2010) , 10.1890/090143
William C. Dennison, Todd R. Lookingbill, Tim JB Carruthers, Jane M. Hawkey, Shawn L. Carter, An eye-opening approach to developing and communicating integrated environmental assessments Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 5, pp. 307- 314 ,(2007) , 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[307:AEATDA]2.0.CO;2
Francis J. Pantus, William C. Dennison, Quantifying and evaluating ecosystem health: a case study from Moreton Bay, Australia. Environmental Management. ,vol. 36, pp. 757- 771 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S00267-003-0110-6
J.H Gentile, M.A Harwell, W Cropper Jr, C.C Harwell, D DeAngelis, S Davis, J.C Ogden, D Lirman, Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability. Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 274, pp. 231- 253 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00746-X
E. Sabine G. Schreiber, Andrew R. Bearlin, Simon J. Nicol, Charles R. Todd, Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application Ecological Management and Restoration. ,vol. 5, pp. 177- 182 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1442-8903.2004.00206.X
Carl J. Walters, Is adaptive management helping to solve fisheries problems AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment. ,vol. 36, pp. 304- 307 ,(2007) , 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[304:IAMHTS]2.0.CO;2