Undermining game fences: who is digging holes in Kalahari sands?

作者: Kristina M. Kesch , Dominik T. Bauer , Andrew J. Loveridge

DOI: 10.1111/AJE.12096

关键词:

摘要: The effectiveness of game fencing as a tool to promote coexistence between humans and wildlife is highly dependent on the maintenance fences. It vital identify animal species, which dig holes under fences, their digging behaviour maintain fences appropriately. We provide data some southern Africa's major hole-digging species for simple albeit effective method enabling stakeholders categorize that are underneath in deep sand habitats by species-specific knowledge sizes shapes holes. Using Botswana's Khutse Game Reserve/Central Kalahari Reserve fence an example, we highlight temporal aspect process hole enlargement. present determine pressure experiences number species. Furthermore, time frame necessary actions, required prevent large predators from transgressing this specific line. were especially interested excluding African lions human-dominated areas. proved be very difficult extremely opportunistic. They mostly utilized initially excavated other, even small species. Resume L'efficacite de la pose clotures pour favoriser entre hommes et faune sauvage depend beaucoup l'entretien des clotures. Il est essentiel d'identifier les especes animales qui creusent trous sous facon dont elles entretenir correctement. Nous fournissons donnees sur certaines principales proposer une methode mais efficace permettra aux parties prenantes classer destinees sauvage, dans sableux profonds, grâce connaissances specifiques taille forme trous. Prenant comme exemple cloture separe, au Botswana, Central Kalahari, nous soulignons l'aspect temporel du creusement leur elargissement. presentons determiner pression que subit part d'un certain nombre d'especes fouisseuses. De plus, apportons le calendrier mesures d'entretien necessaires empecher grands predateurs franchir cette ligne demarcation specifique. etions particulierement interesses par l'efficacite doivent exclure zones forte presence humaine. Ces se sont averes tres difficiles repousser extremement opportunistes. Ils utilisent principalement ont ete creuses d'autres especes, meme petites.

参考文章(11)
Ken Ferguson, Laura Adam, Ferran Jori, An Adaptive Monitoring Programme for Studying Impacts Along the Western Boundary Fence of Kruger National Park, South Africa Fencing for conservation : restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes?. pp. 105- 123 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-1-4614-0902-1_7
Dale A. Wade, The use of fences for predator damage control Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 10, ,(1982)
Michael J Somers, Matthew W Hayward, Fencing for conservation: Restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biological Conservation. ,vol. 142, pp. 1- 13 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2008.09.022
David S. G. Thomas, Paul A. Shaw, The Kalahari environment ,(1991)
Colin Bonnington, Matthew Grainger, Suzannah Dangerfield, Eibleis Fanning, The influence of electric fences on large mammal movements in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania African Journal of Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 280- 284 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-2028.2009.01092.X
P.E. Stander, II. Ghau, D. Tsisaba, II. OMA, |.| VI, Tracking and the interpretation of spoor: a scientifically sound method in ecology Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 242, pp. 329- 341 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1469-7998.1997.TB05805.X
MONIKA SCHIESS-MEIER, SANDRA RAMSAUER, TEFO GABANAPELO, BARBARA KÖNIG, Livestock Predation—Insights From Problem Animal Control Registers in Botswana Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 71, pp. 1267- 1274 ,(2007) , 10.2193/2006-177
Richard E. Hoare, Present and Future Use of Fencing in the Management of Larger African Mammals Environmental Conservation. ,vol. 19, pp. 160- 164 ,(1992) , 10.1017/S0376892900030642
J.J. de Vries, E.T. Selaolo, H.E. Beekman, Groundwater recharge in the Kalahari, with reference to paleo-hydrologic conditions. Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 238, pp. 110- 123 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00325-5