作者: Patricia Tolentino da Rosa de Souza , Milena Binhame Albini Martini , Luciana Reis Azevedo-Alanis
DOI: 10.1111/CID.12634
关键词:
摘要: BACKGROUND Short implants have been presented as an option for posterior rehabilitation in cases of poor bone height. PURPOSE To compare the survival rate short and standard when used single crowns, addition to reporting marginal loss, prosthetic failures, surgical complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Electronic search (PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web Science) hand were performed identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) clinical (CCTs) that evaluated both crowns. RESULTS Out 345 articles identified by electronic search, four studies selected (one CCT three RCTs). The meta-analysis showed there was no significant difference between ones (P = 1.00; RR:1.00; CI:0.97-1.03) with RCTs a one-year follow-up. mean loss ranged from 0.1 mm 0.54 mm. Only one study reported presence failures CONCLUSIONS similar follow-up period. They also low complications, being predictable treatment tooth loss.