Identifying Children in Middle Childhood Who Are at Risk for Reading Problems

作者: Deborah L. Speece , Kristen D. Ritchey , Rebecca Silverman , Christopher Schatschneider , Caroline Y. Walker

DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2010.12087777

关键词:

摘要: Although many advances have been made in early identification and intervention for students with reading disabilities, there has less progress identifying remediating the skills of older children. The National Assessment Educational Progress report shows that 34% fourth-grade perform below basic levels (National Progress, Center Statistics, & Institute Education Sciences, 2007). Some these may experienced difficulty from beginning their school careers, but other confront problems first time middle childhood. In fact, Leach, Scarborough, Rescorla (2003) estimated 41% all disabilities late-emerging (i.e., are not evident until at least third grade). These difficulties identifiable by screening assessments (Compton, Fuchs, Elleman, Gilbert, 2008). Research is needed on methods children who risk childhood to further reduce prevalence failure. The purpose this article investigate definition an group children, specifically those fourth grade. underrepresented literature likely a more heterogeneous poor readers compared younger students. Deficits be broader could include associated (e.g., decoding, word recognition, fluency, spelling) as well comprehension, vocabulary, oral language (Cain, Oakhill, Lemmon, 2004; Catts, Adlof, Weismer, 2006). possibility vary number dimensions requires careful attention predictor variables selected screening, criterion used define problems, methodological procedures both phases paradigm.

参考文章(29)
Joseph R. Jenkins, Roxanne F. Hudson, Evelyn S. Johnson, Screening for At-Risk Readers in a Response to Intervention Framework School Psychology Review. ,vol. 36, pp. 582- 600 ,(2007) , 10.1080/02796015.2007.12087919
G. Reid Lyon, Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., P.O. Box 10624, Baltimore, MD 21285-0624 ($55).. ,(1994)
Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Carol L. Hamlett, Rose M. Allinder, Effects of Expert System Advice within Curriculum-Based Measurement in Teacher Planning and Student Achievement in Spelling. School Psychology Review. ,vol. 20, pp. 49- 66 ,(1991) , 10.1080/02796015.1991.12085532
Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Identifying a Measure for Monitoring Student Reading Progress. School Psychology Review. ,vol. 21, pp. 45- 58 ,(1992) , 10.1080/02796015.1992.12085594
Lynn S. Fuchs, Douglas Fuchs, Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. ,vol. 13, ,(1998)
Frank R. Vellutino, William E. Tunmer, RuSan Chen, James J. Jaccard, Components of Reading Ability: Multivariate Evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development Scientific Studies of Reading. ,vol. 11, pp. 3- 32 ,(2007) , 10.1207/S1532799XSSR1101_2
Alan J. Miller, Subset Selection in Regression ,(2002)
H. Gerry Taylor, Marcia Anselmo, Ann L. Foreman, Christopher Schatschneider, Jennifer Angelopoulos, Utility of Kindergarten Teacher Judgments in Identifying Early Learning Problems Journal of Learning Disabilities. ,vol. 33, pp. 200- 210 ,(2000) , 10.1177/002221940003300208
Leandre R. Fabrigar, Duane T. Wegener, Robert C. MacCallum, Erin J. Strahan, Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods. ,vol. 4, pp. 272- 299 ,(1999) , 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Razia Azen, David V. Budescu, The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods. ,vol. 8, pp. 129- 148 ,(2003) , 10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129