摘要: We present a framework for non-prioritised belief revision --- i.e., in which newly acquired information is not always fully accepted the result of arrived at via kind negotiation between old and new. show how both ordinary partial meet Ferme Hansson's selective can be captured this framework, also it supports definition contraction operators do necessarily satisfy basic AGM postulate (Success).
researchgate.net 
acm.org 参考文章(15)
Aditya Ghose, Randy Goebel, Belief States as Default Theories: Studies in Non-Prioritized Belief Change. european conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 8- 12 ,(1998)
Sven Ove Hansson, A textbook of belief dynamics ,(1999)
Sébastien Konieczny, Ramón Pino Pérez, On the logic of merging principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 488- 498 ,(1998)
Sven Ove Hansson, A Survey of non-Prioritized Belief Revision Erkenntnis. ,vol. 50, pp. 413- 427 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1005534223776
John Cantwell, Resolving Conflicting Information Journal of Logic, Language and Information. ,vol. 7, pp. 191- 220 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008296216319
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Douglas Walton, Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning State University of New York Press. ,(1995)
Simon Parsons, Michael Wooldridge, Languages for negotiation european conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 393- 397 ,(2000)
Sven Ove Hansson, A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Solutions to Exercises Kluwer Academic Publishers. ,(2001)
Moshe Tennenholtz, Noa E. Kfir-Dahav, Multi-agent belief revision theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge. pp. 175- 194 ,(1996)
Peter Z. Revesz, On the semantics of theory change Proceedings of the twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems - PODS '93. pp. 71- 82 ,(1993) , 10.1145/153850.153857