Scoring rules and social choice properties: some characterizations

作者: Bonifacio Llamazares , Teresa Peña

DOI: 10.1007/S11238-014-9429-0

关键词:

摘要: In many voting systems, voters’ preferences on a set of candidates are represented by linear orderings. this context, scoring rules well-known procedures to aggregate the voters. Under these rules, each candidate obtains fixed number points, \(s_k\), time he/she is ranked \(k\)th one voter and ordered according total points they receive. order identify best rule use in situation, we need know which properties met procedures. Although some have been analyzed extensively, there other that not studied for all rules. paper, consider two desirable social choice properties, Pareto-optimality immunity absolute loser paradox, establish characterizations satisfy specific axioms. Moreover, also provide proof result given Saari Barney (The Mathematical Intelligencer 25:17–31, 2003), where meeting reversal symmetry characterized. From results characterization, relationships among properties. Finally, give characterization satisfying three

参考文章(24)
Donald G. Saari, Geometry of voting ,(1994)
Dan S. Felsenthal, Review of Paradoxes Afflicting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate Studies in Choice and Welfare. pp. 19- 91 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_3
D. Lepelley, Une caractérisation du vote à la majorité simple RAIRO - Operations Research. ,vol. 26, pp. 361- 365 ,(1992) , 10.1051/RO/1992260403611
Vincent Merlin, The axiomatic characterizations of majority voting and scoring rules Mathématiques et sciences humaines. Mathematics and social sciences. pp. 87- 109 ,(2003) , 10.4000/MSH.2919
Mosheh Maḥover, Dan S. Felsenthal, Electoral systems : paradoxes, assumptions, and procedures Springer. ,(2012)
Donald G. Saari, Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes Economic Theory. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 53 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S001990050001
Donald G. Saari, Explaining All Three-Alternative Voting Outcomes Journal of Economic Theory. ,vol. 87, pp. 313- 355 ,(1999) , 10.1006/JETH.1999.2541
Florenz Plassmann, T. Nicolaus Tideman, How frequently do different voting rules encounter voting paradoxes in three-candidate elections? Social Choice and Welfare. ,vol. 42, pp. 31- 75 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S00355-013-0720-8
Peter C. Fishburn, William V. Gehrlein, Borda's rule, positional voting, and Condorcet's simple majority principle Public Choice. ,vol. 28, pp. 79- 88 ,(1976) , 10.1007/BF01718459